On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:37 PM, John Poelstra <poelstra(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Jerry Amundson said the following on 10/06/2008 01:49 PM Pacific
Time:
> Nobody had Questions/Comments/Criticisms on my suggestion to use VERIFIED.
>
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2008-September/msg00523....
>
Unfortunately VERIFIED has always been understood in the context of having
"verified" that a bug is fixed so I don't think it is an option. That is
also the understood meaning for RHEL maintainers and would be confusing if
they work on both Fedora and RHEL.
Good to know. Thanks.
I'm leaning more towards the idea that the "Triaged"
keyword makes the most
sense because it doesn't disrupt the STATE change flow and simply adds meta
data to bug. This would also allow us to triage other components that
actually remain in state of NEW until work begins.
+1 for TRIAGED.
So, who out there, feels that an additional keyword like
"Triaged" would
mess up their bugs? :)
NOTE: we are continuing to follow the triage work flow here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow and will
continue to do so.
Can VERIFIED fit on BSWF image and/or text, or is not needed in the
BugZapper context?
If the latter, I think the item "The VERIFIED bug state is not used by
Fedora." should be removed.
jerry
--
There's plenty of youth in America - it's time we find the "fountain of
smart".