==================================
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==================================
Meeting started by adamw at 16:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-11-23/fedora-qa.2015...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call (adamw, 16:00:13)
* Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:03:21)
* "adamw to draft up proposal for better handling of 'special
blockers'" - yep, did that, and we'll be discussing the draft later
in the meeting (adamw, 16:04:13)
* "adamw to finish off the 'installer help' criteria / test case
changes" - did that: can't find the link in new hyperkitty mailing
list archive, but trust me, I did it (adamw, 16:06:18)
* "adamw to work with releng to get rawhide nightly boot.iso compose
working and create an initial f24 nightly validation event" - did
that too, nirik fixed all the things stopping nightly composes and
we have nightly validation events going now (adamw, 16:07:03)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Rawhide_20151120_Installation
(satellit, 16:13:41)
* satellit reports ongoing problems with Rawhide image compose and
install (adamw, 16:14:08)
* Non-media blocker process (adamw, 16:14:28)
* AGREED: QA is generally in favour of changing the process to include
some kind of check on the status of blocker-fixing updates as an
input to go/no-go (adamw, 16:44:49)
* ACTION: kparal to look further into the details of go/no-go process
and propose a practical policy for changing it to cover blockers
fixed by updates (adamw, 16:47:16)
* Open floor (adamw, 16:48:01)
* ACTION: kparal to check with dnf-system-upgrade maintainers if
they're OK with blocking on N+2 upgrades (adamw, 16:55:51)
Meeting ended at 17:00:04 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* kparal to look further into the details of go/no-go process and
propose a practical policy for changing it to cover blockers fixed by
updates
* kparal to check with dnf-system-upgrade maintainers if they're OK with
blocking on N+2 upgrades
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* kparal
* kparal to look further into the details of go/no-go process and
propose a practical policy for changing it to cover blockers fixed
by updates
* kparal to check with dnf-system-upgrade maintainers if they're OK
with blocking on N+2 upgrades
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (86)
* kparal (60)
* dgilmore (16)
* roshi (11)
* sgallagh (10)
* linuxmodder (10)
* satellit_e (10)
* tflink (5)
* zodbot (4)
* garretraziel (4)
* pschindl (3)
* nirik (1)
* satellit (1)
* danofsatx (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`:
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net