On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:49 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:33 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > GFS-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.9.i686 requires kernel =
0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5
> > GFS-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.9.i686 requires
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5smp
> > cman-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.10.i686 requires kernel =
0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5
> > cman-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.10.i686 requires kernel-smp =
0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5
> > dlm-kernel - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.8.i686 requires kernel =
0:2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5
> > dlm-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.1-20051219.162641.FC5.8.i686 requires
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5smp
> > gnbd-kernel - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.14.i686 requires
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5
> > gnbd-kernel-smp - 2.6.14.0-20051108.134753.FC5.14.i686 requires
/lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1826.2.10_FC5smp
>
> I've not looked into this, but shouldn't these be rebuilt automatically
> - they seem to be broken more often than they're not.
... or dropped from core and moved to extras ...
... or just dropped, since their maintainers are showing absolutely no
interest or responsibility for the packages.
--
Peter