let me hijack ... does the strenght meter still think that a correct horse
battery stapple-like password is weak?
K.
Dne Út 21. května 2013 12:43:30, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:41 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> >> Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
> >> password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
> >> account is.
> >
> > Um, I'm pretty sure it is checked. It may not follow precisely the same
> > rules as other checks, I guess, but I get a warning when I use
'111111'
> > that it's a palindrome.
>
> OK, I see it now, but for regular user there is this "progress bar like"
> indicator which tells you how strong is your password. For root I only
> get textual warning.
Ah, I see what you mean. Yeah, it seems reasonable to add that for root,
since as you say, it shows up for the user spoke (and you also get the
strength meter for the encryption passphrase, if you select encryption).
File a bug?
--
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol(a)jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
:: easily be explained by stupidity."