Today (after using the old RC1) I installed the kernel-2.6.26.6-67.fc9 from koji....
I think is very stable, for now it's running without troubles.
Has anyone encountered problems?
I remember in .6 were dropped old patches... so it's a nice mantainance update.
Will it be pushed to updates? :-)
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 14:44 +0200, Carlo Raudino wrote:
Today (after using the old RC1) I installed the kernel-2.6.26.6-67.fc9 from koji....
I think is very stable, for now it's running without troubles.
Has anyone encountered problems?
Nope. No problems here. And this appears to fix the IPSec related random kernel hangs in 2.6.26.5 that I've reported.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466303
I remember in .6 were dropped old patches... so it's a nice mantainance update.
Will it be pushed to updates? :-)
Sounds like it, or something very much like it, based on the comments Dave Jones made in the bugzilla thread.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Mike
Slightly off topic,
I've now also got 2.6.27-3 from rawhide running in F9 once I worked around an initrd race condition with the VMware scsi drivers now that dm-mirror, dm-zero, and dm-snapshot are no longer modules in 2.6.27. Problem was causing lvm to run too early and not detect the physical volumes.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466071
Now that I'm past that, 2.6.27 seems pretty solid and has not shown signs of the IPSec dain bramage that was present in 2.6.26.5.
Mike
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 13:31 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 14:44 +0200, Carlo Raudino wrote:
Today (after using the old RC1) I installed the kernel-2.6.26.6-67.fc9 from koji....
I think is very stable, for now it's running without troubles.
Has anyone encountered problems?
Nope. No problems here. And this appears to fix the IPSec related random kernel hangs in 2.6.26.5 that I've reported.
I remember in .6 were dropped old patches... so it's a nice mantainance update.
Will it be pushed to updates? :-)
Sounds like it, or something very much like it, based on the comments Dave Jones made in the bugzilla thread.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Mike
fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list