Anyone have a url for the backup program bacula, that points to a repo with it included?
Googling hasn't turned it up other than buildlogs for bacula on Dag Weir's.
The sourceforge src.rpm of bacula seems to have spec.file problems I don't know how to fix... so looking for something already packaged that will work on FC[2/3].
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 12:22, Harry Putnam wrote:
Anyone have a url for the backup program bacula, that points to a repo with it included?
Googling hasn't turned it up other than buildlogs for bacula on Dag Weir's.
The sourceforge src.rpm of bacula seems to have spec.file problems I don't know how to fix... so looking for something already packaged that will work on FC[2/3].
Have you seen this URL?
Any reason why you have posted this to the test list?
Douglas Furlong douglas.furlong@firebox.com writes:
The sourceforge src.rpm of bacula seems to have spec.file problems I don't know how to fix... so looking for something already packaged that will work on FC[2/3].
Have you seen this URL?
No I hadn't... nice but it turns up goose eggs for bacula and I'm pretty sure one of the extras repos has it. Google doesn't know about it though.
Any reason why you have posted this to the test list?
I thought it would be obvious its a test machine.
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 13:15, Harry Putnam wrote:
Douglas Furlong douglas.furlong@firebox.com writes:
The sourceforge src.rpm of bacula seems to have spec.file problems I don't know how to fix... so looking for something already packaged that will work on FC[2/3].
Have you seen this URL?
No I hadn't... nice but it turns up goose eggs for bacula and I'm pretty sure one of the extras repos has it. Google doesn't know about it though.
I know (should have mentioned it didn't have it) however, thought it may be of interest just in case you hadn't.
Any reason why you have posted this to the test list?
I thought it would be obvious its a test machine.
Funnily enough, I never went to the telepathy class at school, thought I'd give it a miss for telekinesis, figured it would help me in my ambitions to be come a sloth.
Douglas Furlong douglas.furlong@firebox.com writes:
I thought it would be obvious its a test machine.
Funnily enough, I never went to the telepathy class at school, thought I'd give it a miss for telekinesis, figured it would help me in my ambitions to be come a sloth.
Hehe... Maybe you missed the common-sense class too. Its really not an inordinate jump to think one might post on the `test' list about a pkg to use on a `test' machine.
On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 14:08, Harry Putnam wrote:
Douglas Furlong douglas.furlong@firebox.com writes:
I thought it would be obvious its a test machine.
Funnily enough, I never went to the telepathy class at school, thought I'd give it a miss for telekinesis, figured it would help me in my ambitions to be come a sloth.
Hehe... Maybe you missed the common-sense class too. Its really not an inordinate jump to think one might post on the `test' list about a pkg to use on a `test' machine.
That would require an assumption on my part that you were clever enough to know how to differentiate between the two, that's an assumption I am not prepared to make.
I posted a reply with some helpful information, you are now aware of a site, that may not have helped this time, but may help in the future.
I then added a second query to verify that you were actually using a test release, and were not one of the uneducated masses who just mail any odd list.
A simple not sarcastic, non caustic response stating that you were indeed using a test release would have been sufficient. However, that seems to have escaped your abilities.
I see nothing wrong with the check I made. This could go on for ages, but I can't really be bothered, I shall be sure not to offer any assistance to you in the future, to spare this list these inane responses.
Douglas Furlong douglas.furlong@firebox.com writes:
A simple not sarcastic, non caustic response stating that you were indeed using a test release would have been sufficient. However, that seems to have escaped your abilities.
I see nothing wrong with the check I made. This could go on for ages, but I can't really be bothered, I shall be sure not to offer any assistance to you in the future, to spare this list these inane responses.
There was nothing caustic in my reply... a little chiding at your joke is all... Sorry it rankled you.
But realize that you were alread informed as to what I was running:
From my first post:
"The sourceforge src.rpm of bacula seems to have spec.file problems I don't know how to fix... so looking for something already packaged that will work on FC[2/3]."
There are only `test' versions of FC3 far as I know.
You'll grow thicker skin after while. And as stated earlier, thanks for the URL.
Harry Putnam reader@newsguy.com writes:
The sourceforge src.rpm of bacula seems to have spec.file problems I don't know how to fix... so looking for something already packaged that will work on FC[2/3].
Just an update on this... The sourceforge *src.rpms do work. It expects you to edit the spec file and I didn't now what it really wanted. But then I found this helpfull page on bacula web site: http://www.bacula.org/html-manual/rpm-faq.html#faq1
That tells just what to do.
I'm still having a dependancy problem but moving that to a different thread.