There are many rough edges to the Core5 release. I personally would want the extra week(s) spent on cleaning up.
My nuances I found XEN version will not power off after a shutdown command I found that any user, including guest, could issue a shutdown command I found that there are still keyboard definition problems that are not solved
I agree that having an extra week or even two, where developers can clean up stuff and not have to respond to this newsletter will be more beneficial than having them constantly working in reaction mode. I can wait. I want core5 as stable as is core4.
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:53:52 -0500 From: Jeremy Katz katzj@redhat.com Subject: Fedora Core 5 Status To: fedora-maintainers@redhat.com Cc: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com, fedora-test-list@redhat.com Message-ID: 1142006032.29247.10.camel@orodruin.boston.redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain
Due to circumstances outside of our control, we're going to be unable to keep to the scheduled date of March 15th for the release of FC5 and instead are going to have to make the release date Monday, March 20th. While unfortunate in some ways, this gives us the opportunity to pull in the final GNOME 2.14 tarballs which should be available on Monday assuming the changes are suitably minor.
Jeremy
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 10:33 -0800, Leslie Satenstein wrote:
There are many rough edges to the Core5 release. I personally would want the extra week(s) spent on cleaning up.
Just to prevent any further misconceptions, we are NOT spending this week churning existing packages. We have VERY specific goals of this extra time. Get the kernel working TODAY, finish rebuilding a few packages for a gcc bug found yesterday which tickled selinux, and POSSIBLY get the gnome 2.14 final tarballs in. Thats largely IT. Any further changes requires further testing beyond the scope we're comfortable with in the extra 5~ days.
Some of these other things may be worked on for early stage FC5 updates, but we don't want any further changes happening to the tree that we're trying to get into a shippable state.
Leslie Satenstein wrote:
There are many rough edges to the Core5 release. I personally would want the extra week(s) spent on cleaning up.
My nuances I found XEN version will not power off after a shutdown command
Did you file a bug report on this?
I found that any user, including guest, could issue a shutdown command
This one is not a bug.
I found that there are still keyboard definition problems that are not solved
Any bug reports?
On 3/10/06, Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Did you file a bug report on this?
There is this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182608
-- WC (Bill) Jones -- http://youve-reached-the.endoftheinternet.org/
I filed a bug report on this early last week.
Nothigns been done
From: Rahul Sundaram sundaram@fedoraproject.org Reply-To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases fedora-test-list@redhat.com To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases fedora-test-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: One week delay Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:57:17 +0530
Leslie Satenstein wrote:
There are many rough edges to the Core5 release. I personally would want the extra week(s) spent on cleaning up.
My nuances I found XEN version will not power off after a shutdown command
Did you file a bug report on this?
I found that any user, including guest, could issue a shutdown command
This one is not a bug.
I found that there are still keyboard definition problems that are not solved
Any bug reports?
-- Rahul
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
David Burgess wrote:
I filed a bug report on this early last week.
Hmmn, I don't know if I can do a bugzilla (early last week) search ;~) And there was probably ~1000 issues filed last week.
Please, please help others to even look at your bug report by providing the actual bug number or even better, the url so that all we have to do is click it ! Doing this will save any testers looking at the issue heaps of time in trying to give appropriate search terms to bugzilla.
Nothigns been done
I'm sure you are aware that you haven't paid anyone for fedora; any thing done by others is voluntary, and I guess performed on a big picture - things that must be solved first - process. Whether a box turns off when you want it to - I guess that power switch or power cord is a workaround :)
DaveT.
How about "kernel" ?
From: David Timms dtimms@bigpond.net.au Reply-To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases fedora-test-list@redhat.com To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases fedora-test-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Xen Kernel Not Powering Down Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:42:26 +1100
David Burgess wrote:
I filed a bug report on this early last week.
Hmmn, I don't know if I can do a bugzilla (early last week) search ;~) And there was probably ~1000 issues filed last week.
Please, please help others to even look at your bug report by providing the actual bug number or even better, the url so that all we have to do is click it ! Doing this will save any testers looking at the issue heaps of time in trying to give appropriate search terms to bugzilla.
Nothigns been done
I'm sure you are aware that you haven't paid anyone for fedora; any thing done by others is voluntary, and I guess performed on a big picture - things that must be solved first - process. Whether a box turns off when you want it to - I guess that power switch or power cord is a workaround :)
DaveT.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Dunno if it is his report bug, but here is the same problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182608
And i had the same problem with Hypervisor Kernel 1955. _*BUT this is solved with 2041 !!!!!!! *_shutdown is ok now
David Timms wrote:
David Burgess wrote:
How about "kernel" ?
Is it really that hard to stick in a URL: Does your web browser let you drag and drop a link from the location bar, or is mine something special ? DT.
FORGET it : i were wrong. There is no Hypervisor Kernel 2041 ! BTW it is the same with Hypervisor Kernel 2009
Dunno if it is his report bug, but here is the same problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182608
And i had the same problem with Hypervisor Kernel 1955. _*BUT this is solved with 2041 !!!!!!! *_shutdown is ok now
David Timms wrote:
David Burgess wrote:
How about "kernel" ?
Is it really that hard to stick in a URL: Does your web browser let you drag and drop a link from the location bar, or is mine something special ? DT.