On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 14:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 17:33 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> > AFAICT none of the other tests imply this, but a system that passes all
> > the other tests but into which you can't type anything isn't much use
:)
>
> Very true - but very hard to automate without lego-mindstorms-style
> hackery.
How about the Homer Simpson solution?
"Stupid bird! I never should have left you in charge!"
Heh. Anyway, I've added a functional test requirement for mouse/keyboard
input. Thanks for the idea.
-w