On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 13:06 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> In addition to not being surpressed, as mentioned by you on fd.o
> bugzilla, systemd shouldn't die (since in my case, the messages aren't
> supposed to be suppressed since they are not the same.
>
> Maybe we should fill another bug report on fd.o?
Yep - a generic 'journald is dying when dealing with huge message loads'
ticket seems like something we need. Did your discussion on
systemd-devel go anywhere?
Nope... For reference, it's
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/12373 .
Ended with no decent conclusion reached -- I think I will fill a bug
report later on fd.o and link it on that and this thread.
--
Pedro