On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 12:56 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM, James Laska jlaska@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:58 -0500, John Watzke wrote: > Thanks Thomas. This will work great. Now we just need to figure > out how to drive this initiative.
I think you just did! Best way to start, is by discussing and following up.
Okay, let me look over the test case and test plan templates and see what can be put together. I do like your suggestion of starting with the heavy hitters such as firefox/kernel/glibc. That will get us started and we can work our way down to the more obscure test cases.
Sometime this week, I'll put up a wiki page with a general list of known critpath packages. This will give us a working set to start on. I'm thinking we can use that list to let folks "sign up" to track down the maintainer and work through the processing of defining a test case for the package and perhaps updating the status of preparing the tests. Nothing too fancy... just something to keep some status on.
Awesome, I appreciate your initiative here :) If you find it helpful to manage status and coordinate efforts with multiple proventesters, feel free to file tickets in the fedora-qa TRAC instance. Let me know if you'd like to create any additional TRAC milestones to organize this effort.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
Thanks, James