On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Whichever way it falls out, we've got an unnecessary change in a core system library destabilizing things just a few days before "final freeze", and I am not happy about that.
Neither am I. I'm happy with just -12 broke it, -14 didn't, -15 did. I'd rather the glibc folks figure out which change in between those is really the problem, because the malloc change isn't the only one there.