On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 16:54 -0500, Michel Salim wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<pocallaghan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> I thought that was a plus (+) when file ACLs were present.
>
> That's what "info ls" says (though "man ls" doesn't). I
can't see any
> reference to a '.' as part of the mode.
>
File a bug? info and man really ought to return the same information.
I decided to report this, but I can't figure out which component to file
it against. There a BZ page for documentation bugs, but nothing
specifically mentions man pages (or info). Or is one expected to file it
against the actual command ('ls')?
poc