On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:19, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 15:28, James Ralston wrote:
> It doesn't really make sense to take the effort to put AMD64 support
> in Cambridge, for two reasons:
>
> 1. The Opteron is AMD's server chip, and is thus best paired
> with RHEL.
Ugh.. sounds like a marketing call on that one. Guess we should strip
all the server stuff out of RHLP since it's all better suited for RHEL
anyway...
*grumble*
I know some researchers in physics departments who would be interested
in burning some cycles on a rebuild.
Beowulf-node != server.
-sv