Re: DVD deltaisos available for 12-RC.1 -> 12-RC.3 (i386, ppc, x86_64)
by Andre Robatino
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > (around October 7). I hope it's not too long before all of these
> > get rebuilt.
> Unfortunately nothing's going to get rebuilt now :/
I know it's not going to happen for F12, but I was hoping for F13. Most
if not all of them should end up getting rebuilt by then for other
reasons. If there's still a few left, how hard would it be to rebuild
them, given that the version/release number wouldn't have to change (so
no one sees any extra updates)?
14 years, 5 months
DVD deltaisos available for 12-RC.1 -> 12-RC.3 (i386, ppc, x86_64)
by Andre Robatino
DVD deltaisos for Fedora 12-RC.1 -> 12-RC.3 for each of i386, ppc, and
x86_64 are now available at
http://thepiratebay.org/user/andre14965/
The sizes are 2.6%, 4.0%, and 1.7% of the full 12-RC.1 ISO size, resp.
The time to run applydeltaiso is approximately 3 minutes.
WARNING: I just discovered that using these currently works only on
Fedora 11 and below, not on Fedora 12/Rawhide, where applydeltaiso will
fail with an "md5sum mismatch, iso is corrupt" error. Sorry for not
catching this earlier. This is due to the presence of xz-compressed
noarch RPMs built on PPC hosts before the xz endianness bug was fixed
(around October 7). I hope it's not too long before all of these get
rebuilt.
14 years, 5 months
Broken dependencies with Fedora 10 updates-testing - 2009-11-07
by Michael Schwendt
======================================================================
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
======================================================================
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
autotrust
db4o
fedora-gnat-project-common
gadget
gedit-vala
llvm
oorexx
php
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-10-ppc:
db4o-6.1-4.fc9.ppc requires mono(Mono.Cecil) = 0:0.6.8.8607
llvm-devel-2.3-2.fc10.ppc64 requires llvm = 0:2.3-2.fc10
php-devel-5.2.6-5.ppc64 requires php = 0:5.2.6-5
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-10-x86_64:
oorexx-3.2.0-4.fc9.i386 requires librexxapi.so.3
oorexx-3.2.0-4.fc9.i386 requires librexx.so.3
php-devel-5.2.6-5.i386 requires php = 0:5.2.6-5
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-10-i386:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc10.i386 requires libunbound.so.0
gedit-vala-0.3.2-3.fc10.1.i386 requires libgtksourcecompletion-1.0.so.1
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-10-ppc:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc10.ppc requires libunbound.so.0
gedit-vala-0.3.2-3.fc10.1.ppc requires libgtksourcecompletion-1.0.so.1
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-10-ppc64:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc10.ppc64 requires libunbound.so.0()(64bit)
fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc10.noarch requires gcc-gnat
gadget-0.0.3-2.fc10.noarch requires ejabberd
gedit-vala-0.3.2-3.fc10.1.ppc64 requires libgtksourcecompletion-1.0.so.1()(64bit)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-10-x86_64:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc10.x86_64 requires libunbound.so.0()(64bit)
gedit-vala-0.3.2-3.fc10.1.x86_64 requires libgtksourcecompletion-1.0.so.1()(64bit)
14 years, 5 months
Broken dependencies with Fedora 11 updates-testing - 2009-11-07
by Michael Schwendt
======================================================================
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
======================================================================
Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name):
asterisk
autotrust
oorexx
openmpi
player
R-RScaLAPACK
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-i386:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs
asterisk-mobile-1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11.i586 requires asterisk = 0:1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
player-static-2.1.1-10.fc11.i586 requires player-devel = 0:2.1.1-10.fc11
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-ppc:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.ppc requires openmpi-libs
asterisk-mobile-1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11.ppc requires asterisk = 0:1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.ppc requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
player-static-2.1.1-10.fc11.ppc requires player-devel = 0:2.1.1-10.fc11
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-ppc64:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.ppc64 requires openmpi-libs
asterisk-mobile-1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11.ppc64 requires asterisk = 0:1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.ppc64 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
player-static-2.1.1-10.fc11.ppc64 requires player-devel = 0:2.1.1-10.fc11
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-11-x86_64:
R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs
asterisk-mobile-1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11.x86_64 requires asterisk = 0:1.6.1-0.23.rc1.fc11
oorexx-3.2.0-4.fc9.i386 requires librexx.so.3
oorexx-3.2.0-4.fc9.i386 requires librexxapi.so.3
openmpi-vt-1.3.1-1.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs = 0:1.3.1-1.fc11
player-static-2.1.1-10.fc11.x86_64 requires player-devel = 0:2.1.1-10.fc11
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-i386:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc11.i586 requires libunbound.so.0
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-ppc:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc11.ppc requires libunbound.so.0
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-ppc64:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc11.ppc64 requires libunbound.so.0()(64bit)
======================================================================
Broken packages in fedora-updates-11-x86_64:
autotrust-0.3.1-1.fc11.x86_64 requires libunbound.so.0()(64bit)
14 years, 5 months
rawhide report: 20091107 changes
by Fedora compose checker
Compose started at Sat Nov 7 08:15:11 UTC 2009
Updated Packages:
anaconda-12.46-1.fc12
---------------------
* Fri Nov 06 2009 David Cantrell <dcantrell(a)redhat.com> - 12.46-1
- Correct modopts initialization in loader (take 2) (#531932). (dcantrell)
gdm-2.28.1-24.fc12
------------------
* Fri Nov 06 2009 Ray Strode <rstrode(a)redhat.com> 2.28.1-24
- Fix login button after cancel on livecd
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-13.fc12.2
-------------------------------------
* Fri Nov 06 2009 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com> - 2.25.3-13.2
- Bump again on F12 for release, avoiding gecko update
* Thu Nov 05 2009 Jan Horak <jhorak(a)redhat.com> - 2.25.3-13
- Rebuild against newer gecko
lynx-2.8.6-23.fc12
------------------
* Fri Nov 06 2009 Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc(a)redhat.com> - 2.8.6-23
- removed dependency on indexthml
- changed default homepage to start.fedoraproject.org
Summary:
Added Packages: 0
Removed Packages: 0
Modified Packages: 4
14 years, 5 months
Screen freezes after some minutes with the nouveau driver
by Joachim Backes
Hi,
I'm not sure if this has already been reported: I'm running F12 with the
nouveau driver, and after locking the screen with the screensaver
applet, it takes some minutes until the system freezes completely (mouse
cannot be moved, no keyboard input is possible). Only a hard reset
helps. This happens since 2 days.
Anybody has seen this? All actual F12 updates are applied.
Regards
Joachim Backes <joachim.backes(a)rhrk.uni-kl.de>
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
14 years, 5 months
F12 date
by Paul W. Frields
Thank you to everyone on the rel-eng and QA teams for working so hard
on this release. It's a cliche to say, "This needs to be the best
Fedora release ever," so I won't say it. :-) However, I do think that
we have the opportunity to turn out a really fantastic Fedora 12.
Early reviews have been very good, a lot of interest is churning up,
and FWIW I think the distro looks terrific everywhere I've tried it.
I did want to hypothesize about the unlikely case where people in
rel-eng and QA were to come to me and say, "We have the following set
of concerns, and we're confident we could knock them out, but someone
needs to make a call because we're conflicted about a slip." In that
case I have to admit I'd probably decide in favor of a strong release.
I know that violates the precept of being time-based. I also wanted
to be honest about the importance of this release as a starting point
for the things we want to unleash in Fedora 13 and beyond.
However, my feelings are just that and this should be a call made by
consensus between the teams responsible for the work of making Fedora
ready for release. Thanks again, everyone, and godspeed!
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
14 years, 5 months