sleeping function called from invalid context in kernel-2.6.8-1.521
by Dave Hawkes
Hi All,
If I use kernel-2.6.8-1.521 or kernel-2.6.7-1.494.2.2 with FC2 I get the following error logged about every second to
the console:
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: Debug: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slab.c:2000
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: in_atomic():1[expected: 0], irqs_disabled():1
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<0211b765>] __might_sleep+0x82/0x8c
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<021470e7>] __kmalloc+0x42/0x7d
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<2188c14e>] ohci_urb_enqueue+0x105/0x46c [ohci_hcd]
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<02273d60>] hcd_submit_urb+0x205/0x241
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<02274b25>] usb_submit_urb+0x1d6/0x1dd
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<022746c4>] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x14/0x3d
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<2188af4a>] finish_urb+0x190/0x220 [ohci_hcd]
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<2188bfdb>] dl_done_list+0x4f/0xbd [ohci_hcd]
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<2188cd16>] ohci_irq+0x131/0x2b6 [ohci_hcd]
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<02274713>] usb_hcd_irq+0x26/0x4b
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<0210782f>] handle_IRQ_event+0x21/0x41
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<02107d2e>] do_IRQ+0x1be/0x303
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: =======================
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<0210403b>] default_idle+0x23/0x26
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<0210408c>] cpu_idle+0x1f/0x34
Aug 22 09:40:22 localhost kernel: [<0239b6ae>] start_kernel+0x221/0x224
However if I use kernel-2.6.6-1.435.2.3 then none of these messages appear.
The system appears to function correctly despite these messages. Does anyone have any idea as to their cause and if
stability is likely to be affected?
Thanks
Dave Hawkes
19 years, 8 months
gaim-0.82 rawhide testing
by Warren Togami
FYI...
gaim-0.82 is currently scheduled for Thursday release upstream. Every
day until then I will be updating the rawhide FC3 gaim to a CVS snapshot
so that we can easily participate in bug squashing and possibly prevent
last minute regressions from reaching 0.82 final. A great many bugs are
fixed in 0.82 target snapshots, including several File Transfer crashers
that Fedora users were complaining about.
Bug Reports against our gaim-0.81.99 CVS snapshots should be filed ONLY
in RH Bugzilla against Product: Fedora Core Version: devel. Please be
sure to search for duplicates before filing bugs.
Warren Togami
wtogami(a)redhat.com
19 years, 8 months
Bug in Up2date resolution when packages marked skipped
by Jim Cornette
I noticed that when a package may have many different elements, such as
xorg-x11, updating will fail because deps might be needed from the
excluded list.
I had this happen because of adding xorg-x11 to my skipped packages
recently. The package that caused the conflict was
xorg-x11-deprecated-libs-6.7.9
What happened was a pop-up appeared indicating what will be attached to
this message. Since this package was marked on the skipped list, it
would not resolve.
As you can imagine, with the pop-up dialog box, it scrolled off of the
top and bottom of the screen.
I did not search bugzilla regarding this sort of error. I don't think
that too many excluded packages would contain so many rpms per program.
I removed xorg-x11 from the skipped programs list and installation
continued normally.
If someone needed "watched" packages added to their skipped lists, this
might be some problem that is worth looking into.
attached pop-up with xorg-x11* added to skipped package list.
If this is by design, maybe some method for determining the group the
program belong to when skipped programs selected might be a nice add-on
feature.
Jim
19 years, 8 months
make world - xorg .. CVS source
by Jim Cornette
After downloading the src rpm and installing the rpm, from the SPEC
directory, I then ran the below command on the spec.
rpmbuild -bp --target i686 xorg-x11.spec
Now from the BUILD directory with xorg in, I typed make world w/o
editing anything.
The compilation is taking place. What is the output? RPMS or compiled
binaries somewhere? Will it be i686 archetecture?
--
What a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
-- WOP, "War Games"
19 years, 8 months
Re: no USB jump/flash drive support yet
by t l
I have two different USB Flash drives: one works,
the other does not. Both worked in FC2.
Here are the kind of messages I get for the failing one:
Jul 31 12:21:46 fedora kernel: ohci_hcd 0000:00:03.2: wakeup
Jul 31 12:21:47 fedora kernel: usb 4-1: new full speed USB device
using address 2
Jul 31 12:21:47 fedora kernel: Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
Jul 31 12:21:47 fedora kernel: usb-storage: probe of 4-1:1.0 failed
with error -1
Jul 31 12:21:47 fedora kernel: usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage
Jul 31 12:21:47 fedora kernel: USB Mass Storage support registered
After which you cannot access/mount the drive, etc.
Here is a Bugzilla I filed a while ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128932
I haven't seen any activity on it .....
tom
---------------------------------------------
* From: Nils Philippsen <nphilipp redhat com>
On Sun, 2004-08-22 at 20:49, raxet wrote:
> Running the latest FC3T1 here and am dismayed that apparently there is
> ZARRO support for these USB flash/pin/jump drives.
You're very probably wrong. This has been working since FC1 at least,
given that 2.6.8-1.526 contains the usb-storage module I guess that this
kernel still will support my USB flash disk. I want to verify this
shortly as the machine running FC3 devel isn't where I am now.
NB: This mail is signed with a key that resides on my USB flash disk, I
use FC2. Go figure ;-).
Nils
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
19 years, 8 months
Fw: Kernek 526 is reporting an error with an LV
by Dwaine Castle
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dwaine Castle" <dcastle(a)carolina.rr.com>
To: <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 1:26 PM
Subject: Kernek 526 is reporting an error with an LV
| After installing the new kernel this afternoon, my system reports a bad
file
| system for my one logical volume. If I boot the previous kernel
everything
| is OK and no errors are reported. Does anybody know how I might fix this
| problem? Is this a bug or just me?
|
|
| Thanks.
| Dwaine
|
I may have been a bit hasty claiming that booting the 524 kernel solved all
the problems caused by today's update. Neither yum nor up2date can find a
server. I can see my network, but I can't seem to get past my router to the
internet at all.
Has anybody else experienced problems with today's update?
Thanks.
Dwaine
19 years, 8 months
RE: DHCP no longer updates /etc/resolv.conf with nameservers
by Ernest L. Williams Jr.
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-test-list-bounces(a)redhat.com on behalf of Kaj J.Niemi
Sent: Mon 8/23/2004 8:47 PM
To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: DHCP no longer updates /etc/resolv.conf with nameservers
> I am not getting my "/etc/resolv.conf" updated with my ISPs nameservers
> any longer. Has anyone else seen this with "dhcp-3.0.1-7"
> The above does not happen with my other machine that has "dhcp-3.0.1-4"
Do your versions of initscripts differ? Maybe you hit bug #130575. :)
Oops. I have initscripts-7.66-1 on the machine that does not work.
On the machine that works I also have "initscripts-7.59-1"
So, I am convinced that I am experiencing the bug #130575 that you mention.
I will wait for initscripts-7.67 to hit rawhide, right?
Thanks,
Ernesto
// kaj
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
19 years, 8 months
DHCP no longer updates /etc/resolv.conf with nameservers
by Ernest L. Williams Jr.
Hi,
I am not getting my "/etc/resolv.conf" updated with my ISPs nameservers any longer.
Has anyone else seen this with "dhcp-3.0.1-7"
The above does not happen with my other machine that has "dhcp-3.0.1-4"
Has anyone else seen this? I will check bugzilla as well.
Thanks,
Ernesto
19 years, 8 months
rpm Segfault
by Oldman
Well something has really screwed up this time!
On Friday last, I set about to update my box, I installed the 30 some
programs, up2date failed near the end of the process. After up2date did
it's cleanup, 1 file was left xorg-x11-xdm. I believe the failure was
reported as a segfault, but possibly I am misremembering as I recall
seeing something about a bad/mangled header. Further attempts to
install this file always resulted in a segfault, but when I did a rpm -
qa | grep xorg, I found that rpm reported that the file was installed.
Ok. the xorg file is irrelevant to my problem in that any attempt to
install any file results in a segfault. I ran strace on it and found
that the command exited at:
open("/etc/rpm/macros", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file
or directory)
open("/etc/rpm/i386-linux/macros", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
stat64("/root/.rpmmacros", 0xfef150d0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
time(NULL) = 1093270943
open("/proc/filesystems", O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, "nodev\tsysfs\nnodev\trootfs\nnodev\tb"..., 4095) = 267
close(3) = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
only 1 other error is reported, just about the first open returns
ENOENT:
open("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
but then the rpm continues until the above lines.
What I've tried:
booted into FC2 and forced a re-install of rpm-4.10
No errors - No help either
tested an rpm of rpm-4.02
So many dependencies!
Listed contents of rpm and found that it provided a file macros, at
usr/lib/rpm and provided a link to that file in /etc
that may have worked but I found another missing file with the same
name (macros) later on - removed link (how many different files named
macros can rpm use?)
What's left:
try yum update from FC2 using --root options
may or may not fix the problem as there were no other files to download
for rpm after the error initially occurred
Delete and re-install from CD - perform up2dates the rest of the week.
Yeah, but I HATE to give up!
can anyone make another suggestion?
Scott
19 years, 8 months
k3b/cdrecord
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
I'm trying to burn a 4.2Gb file to DVD using k3b.
At somewhere near the 1.2Gb level, the recording stops dead, yet k3b
says the full burn has occured. When I burn 3 files which add up to
2.9Gb in size, the burn works fine.
Has anyone else seen this behaviour from k3b/cdrecord or have I found
something which needs to go into bugzilla
k3b - 0.11.12-2
cdrecord - 2.01.0.a34-1
NEC 2500 DVDRW (IDE)
TTFN
Paul
--
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful - and so are we,"
"They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our
people - and neither do we." - George W. Bush, Aug 2004
19 years, 8 months