Where has XF86Config gone in FC2?
by Reg Clemens
Where has the XF86Config file gone in Fedora2?
Actually, Ive done a 'find / -name XF86Config -print'
and it isnt any where to be found, so has it been
renamed under Xorg or what?
Im sure the server still needs the info that used to
be there.
--
Reg.Clemens
reg(a)dwf.com
20 years
K3b ?
by Jim
Where do I download K3b for FC2?
Jim Tate
20 years
Unresolved errors on yum...
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
I've just tried a yum update and have the following errors...
Resolving dependencies
.conflict between initscripts and pppd
Package rusers-server needs libproc.so.3.2.0, this is not available
Package rusers-server needs libproc.so.3.2.0(_3_1_14), this is not
available
Okay, I can do the yum -e pppd (I don't use ppp anyway), but what
provides libproc?
TTFN
Paul
--
"Your lives are in the hands of men no smarter than you or I, many of
them incompetent boobs. I know this because I worked alongside them,
gone bowling with them, watched them pass me over for promotions time
and again. And I say ... This stinks!" - Homer Simpson
20 years
FC2 install failure with selinux turned on....
by t l
I did a fresh SELinux (and 'everything') installation of FC2 (wiping clean
a previously working copy of FC2T3). That is, I entered 'selinux' at
the installation/boot prompt.
I repartitioned and formatted the drive into /boot, /, /home (all ext3)
and swap partitons.
I selected 'install everything', and the install and 'firstboot' appears
to have worked properly. I specified a new user (tbl), NTP etc. when propted.
When the system 'came up' and I logged in as my 'normal' user, I got
the following error popup:
Your home directory is listed as:
'/home/tbl'
but it does not appear to exist. Do you want to log in with the
/ (root) directory as your home directory?
It is unlikely anything will work unless you use a failsafe session.
So, something didn't setup quite right. (I'll boot single user and see
if the directory got created and labeled incorrectly)
It then return to the login screen, where I tried to login as root. This
time I got the following:
The Applet "gnome-settings-daemon" has quit unexpectedly. You can
inform .....".
Clicking the 'inform developers' button has not no apparent effect.
Anyone see this/have hints?
tom
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
20 years
RE: saw this review posted on slashdot of FC2
by King, John (Greg) (LMIT-HOU)
well according to you nothing as it does not exist in bugzilla and therefore
does not exits.
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-test-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of William Hooper
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:08 PM
To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: saw this review posted on slashdot of FC2
King, John (Greg) (LMIT-HOU) said:
> Slashdot has a news item about an FC2 review
Remind me again, what does this have to do with testing "...Fedora Core
development releases"?
--
William Hooper
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
20 years
RE: saw this review posted on slashdot of FC2
by King, John (Greg) (LMIT-HOU)
I was refering to the bug the author mentioned in his review. Just because
something has not been posted on bugzilla does not mean it does not exist.
Users are experiencing it regardless. What it does mean is that the devs
will not be aware of the issue to work on it and as a result it wont get
fixed until they are made aware.
Before posting it as a bug on bugzilla, I was going to start looking into
logs when I got home from work and then see if it was something I did first
(until then I just used yum).
If others had the same bug (the author and some other posters on slashdot)
then it reads to me like it is not something isolated I did and will need to
be added to bugzilla.
-Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-test-list-bounces(a)redhat.com
[mailto:fedora-test-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Jeff Spaleta
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:16 PM
To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases
Subject: Re: saw this review posted on slashdot of FC2
On Thu, 20 May 2004 12:58:12 -0500, King, John (Greg) (LMIT-HOU)
<greg.king(a)lmit.com> wrote:
>
> Anyhow, just an fyi so far I have had a pretty good run with FC2 although
> the up2date bug and dual boot bug are annoying.
Up2date bug? Its not a bug if its not in bugzilla. If you are going to
call it a bug please cite the approprate bug ticket. I used up2date
last night right after an fc2 install to get downloads...I had no
problems.
-jef
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
20 years
Re: Difference Between Updated FC2T3 and Actual FC2
by Fulko.Hew@sita.aero
"Brian Van Grunsven" <bvangrunsven(a)nighthawkradiologyservices.net> asked:
> At the risk of sounding very dumb - what would be the difference between
an
> install of FC2T3 that has all updates installed and the actual release of
> FC2?
Basically nothing.
I do think there were a few 'installation' issues that would only have
been fixed if you did a re-install, but operationally, It should be the
same.
If you've got a working system, and it "ain't broke"... don't fix it.
Having said that, I have installed the official release over top of my
perfectly working test release that I've been tracking all along,
I did it for 'peace of mind' sake... but I know I'm probably deluding
myself.
> Also - this may be a bit off topic ... but does anyone have a suggestion
for
> a decent dvd player and/or writer to run on fedora?
I have installed both xine and mplayer, they both work, and are both
decent.
YMMV.
> Thanks all - I've been reading through most of the posts and many have
been
> VERY helpful to say the least!
20 years
Difference Between Updated FC2T3 and Actual FC2
by Brian Van Grunsven
At the risk of sounding very dumb - what would be the difference between an
install of FC2T3 that has all updates installed and the actual release of
FC2?
Also - this may be a bit off topic ... but does anyone have a suggestion for
a decent dvd player and/or writer to run on fedora?
Thanks all - I've been reading through most of the posts and many have been
VERY helpful to say the least!
-Brian
20 years
Re: Why is "LANG=en_US.UTF-8" the default in Fedora
by Mike Hogsett
> Many applications seem to have a problem with the default locale in
> Fedora. (e.g. adobe acrobat reader)
Include /bin/bash in that list as well...
Having the following ~/.inputrc
set input-meta on
set output-meta on
set show-all-if-ambiguous on
set visible-stats on
Meta-p: history-search-backward
Meta-n: history-search-forward
Keep LANG set to Fedora's default and meta-{p,n} don't work as
advertised inside bash.
- Mike
20 years
tex4ht - please add
by Neal Becker
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I just downloaded tex4ht srpm from suse. Remove buildrequires and requires
from the spec, and it builds/installs/works.
This is an important application, because it is one of the only ways to
convert LaTeX -> M$ word (via html).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFArOO3MDqogpR5tkMRAm2CAJ9GQUYHSpTb4VyREFMZqH/4jbu+/ACcDDy7
mJwd895dDiMejtcacAYJfak=
=PPda
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 years