RE: Lock up
by BC
ide=nodma did not work for me. I still get the lock up
VP_IDE: VIA vt8237 (rev 00) IDE UDMA, BIOS settings: hda:pio , hdb:pio
hde: lost interruppt
hde: lost interruppt
hde: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63
hde: lost interruppt
I do have a maxtor drive 30 G on hda and a dvd drive on hdb. I don't get any dma errors. I eventually get through boot to the Spalsh screen right after it probes for monitor etc. and then locks up.
BC
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:54:48 -0800
From: Rick Johnson <rjohnson(a)medata.com>
Organization: Medata, Inc.
To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: lock up on install - Dell laptop as well
Reply-To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
BC wrote:
> I tried to install but it locks up at the fedora splash screen. Error I get are:
>
> I have an Abit motherboard with via chipset SATA Hard drive.
>
> 1) HDE lost interuppt on boot 10 mesages --- SATA drive
>
> It finally boots and goes to splash screen then locks up
>
Not to be me too, but I'm getting the same error booting from an
IDE-CDROM within a Dell Lattitude CPx laptop.
<6>ice-cd: cmd 0x28 timed out
<4>hdc: DMA interrupt recovery
<4>hdc: lost interrupt
The media md5sum's just fine, so it's not a bad disc.
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson(a)medata.com
Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc.
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:24:15 -0700
From: BC <fedora(a)networklifeline.net>
Subject: lock up on install
To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
Reply-To: fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com
I tried to install but it locks up at the fedora splash screen. Error I get are:
I have an Abit motherboard with via chipset SATA Hard drive.
1) HDE lost interuppt on boot 10 mesages --- SATA drive
It finally boots and goes to splash screen then locks up
BC
20 years, 4 months
specifying NIC driver at bootup
by Gene C.
I have having a problem trying to install FC2 test1. The system I have as a
3C940 NIC on the motherboard. This is supported by the sk98lin driver but
this is not recognized by the installer.
Under FC1, the installer prompted me to select a driver but this is not
occuring on FC2 --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115528
Is there a way to specify the NIC driver to use with a kernel boot parameter?
--
Gene
20 years, 4 months
FC2-test1 CD1 boot on K6-2
by David L Norris
On my Laptop (KDS 5345 w/ AMD K6-2 450 MHz) the kernel on CD1 won't
boot. The CD passes media check on my Athlon desktop system, boots and
will install.
When it tries to boot the CD on the laptop I see this:
Loading vmlinuz...............
Loading initrd.img................................................
(hard reset)
I have been tracking the latest fedora-development on the laptop for a
few weeks. Currently that should be roughly the same as the FC2-test1
CD, right? I'm running 2.6.1-1.65 with no apparent problems. I have
experienced this reset problem before with a LiveCD using a 2.4 kernel
which I believe was optimized for i686.
Is there some boot parameter I might need to pass? Or should I file a
bug? (Against what?)
Output from my media check:
$ /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/checkisomd5 --verbose /dev/cdrom
/dev/cdrom: f2f3e9904a0b34657b044e4c6c9da1ca
Percent complete: 100.0%
100.0
The supported flag value is 0
The media check is complete, the result is: PASS.
It is OK to install from this media.
--
David Norris
http://www.webaugur.com/dave/
ICQ - 412039
20 years, 4 months
kernel Oops with 2.6.2-1.74 on FC1
by Gansser, Martin
I have a problem with the new 2.6.2-1.74 Kernel on FC1:
Is this a known problem ?
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: smartd version 5.21 Copyright (C) 2002-3 Bruce Allen
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<c01f5add>] kobject_get+0x4d/0x50
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<c025219e>] get_device+0xe/0x20
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Opened configuration file /etc/smartd.conf
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<c0252da8>] bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xd0
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<e0a31c32>] nodemgr_node_probe+0x42/0x100 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<e0a31af0>] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<e0a3200f>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x13f/0x170 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Configuration file /etc/smartd.conf parsed.
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<e0a31ed0>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x170 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Device: /dev/hda, opened
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: [<c0109295>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Device: /dev/hda, found in smartd database.
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel:
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 8930ec83
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Device: /dev/hda, is SMART capable. Adding to "monitor" list.
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: printing eip:
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1587]: Monitoring 1 ATA and 0 SCSI devices
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: 8930ec83
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd: Starten von smartd succeeded
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko smartd[1589]: smartd has fork()ed into background mode. New PID=1589.
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: *pde = 00000000
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: Oops: 0000 [#1]
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: CPU: 0
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: EIP: 0060:[<8930ec83>] Not tainted
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: EFLAGS: 00010282
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko acpid: Starten von acpid succeeded
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: EIP is at 0x8930ec83
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: eax: e0a641fc ebx: e0a641fc ecx: e0a641d8 edx: 8930ec83
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: esi: e0a31520 edi: 00000000 ebp: e0a30320 esp: dfba3f50
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Feb 12 21:46:19 gecko kernel: Process knodemgrd_0 (pid: 1273, threadinfo=dfba2000 task=dfba6fe0)
Feb 12 21:46:20 gecko kernel: Stack: c01f5b74 e0a641d8 e0a641e0 e0a64120 dfad74e0 c0252dbd e0a6416c 00000000
Feb 12 21:46:20 gecko kernel: dfba3fa4 dfad74d8 dfba3fa4 de2dfc20 ddda4000 e0a31c32 e0a31af0 0000ffff
Feb 12 21:46:21 gecko kernel: dfba3fbc 00000004 ddda4000 00000000 00000001 de2dfc20 dfad749c f0000234
Feb 12 21:46:21 gecko kernel: Call Trace:
Feb 12 21:46:21 gecko kernel: [<c01f5b74>] kobject_cleanup+0x94/0xa0
Feb 12 21:46:21 gecko kernel: [<c0252dbd>] bus_for_each_dev+0x8d/0xd0
Feb 12 21:46:22 gecko kernel: [<e0a31c32>] nodemgr_node_probe+0x42/0x100 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:22 gecko kernel: [<e0a31af0>] nodemgr_probe_ne_cb+0x0/0x90 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:22 gecko kernel: [<e0a3200f>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x13f/0x170 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:22 gecko kernel: [<e0a31ed0>] nodemgr_host_thread+0x0/0x170 [ieee1394]
Feb 12 21:46:23 gecko kernel: [<c0109295>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Feb 12 21:46:23 gecko kernel:
Feb 12 21:46:23 gecko kernel: Code: Bad EIP value.
Feb 12 21:46:23 gecko kernel: ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team
Kernel 2.6.1-1.65 works without problems.
20 years, 4 months
signall 11 while beginning install
by Darrell Esau
Hello all,
Downloaded the ISO images from the stanford ftp mirror, checked md5
sums, then burned.
Put CD1 into an older Sony VAIO laptop and turned it on. (The machine
currently is running FC 1)
Hit enter on the grub boot screen for graphical install, then tested the
first CD media -- it checked out with a PASS.
I then continued with install at which point I got this:
"install exited abnormally -- received signal 11"
Looking on the other virtual screens:
(F3)
* MD5SUM -> fsf3e9904a0b34657b044e4c6c9da1ca
* skipsectors = 15
* isostatus = 0
* mediacheck: /tmp/cdrom (Fedora Core 1.90 disc 1) PASSED
* value of isostatus iso flag is 0
* ejecting /tmp/cdrom...
* mntloop loop0 on /mnt/runtime as /mnt/source/Fedora/base/stage2.img fd
is 17
* getting ready to span shell now
(F4)
<6>cs: IO port probe 0x0a00-0x0aff: clean.
<6>cs: memory probe 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff: clean.
<7>divert: allocating divert_blk for eth0
<6>eth0: NE2000 (DL10019 rev 38): io 0x300, irq 3, hw_addr 00:E8:98:75:D4:4C
<7>ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
<7>request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe --nls_iso8859-1. error = -16
<4>Unable to load NLS charset iso8859-1
<4>Unable to load NLS charset utf8
<7>ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A
<4>Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
<4>VFS: Can't find ext2 filesystem on dev loop0.
<7>ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
<7>request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- nls_iso8859-1. error = -16
<4>Unable to load NLS charset iso8859-1
<4>Unable to load NLS charset utf8
<7>ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A
<7>ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
<7>request_module: failed /sbin/modprobe -- nls_iso8859-1. error = -16
<4>Unable to load NLS charset iso8859-1
<4>Unable to load NLS charset utf8
<7>ISO 9660 Extensions: RRIP_1991A
<4>Unable to identify CD-ROM format.
<4>VFS: Can't find ext2 filesystem on dev loop0.
20 years, 4 months
No cdrom eject during install
by Rick Johnson
I noted between disc 1 and 2 of FC2-test1 that the CD did not eject when
the next disc was requested to continue with XFree86-base-fonts. The
console noted:
not done, unmounting, line 258
not done, unmounting, line 267
I was able to manually eject the cd, however.
Disc 2 to Disc 3 did the same thing, same messages.
I'm installing on a Dell Lattitude CPx, using the ide=nodma (which makes
it VERY slow to install :-/).
-Rick
--
Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson(a)medata.com
Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc.
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc
20 years, 4 months
Upgrade from devel to Fed2
by Jim Cornette
The installer sucessfully upgraded my system from Development to Fed2 -
Test 1.
The packages upgraded and errors are the below.
Upgrading 5 packages
The following packages were automatically
selected to be installed:
Upgrade: XFree86 was on the system. Pulling in xterm for upgrade.
Upgrading pcmcia-cs-3.2.7-1.3.i386.
warning: /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia created as /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia.rpmnew
Upgrading compat-db-4.1.25-1.i386.
Upgrading webalizer-2.01_10-18.i386.
error: %post(webalizer-2.01_10-18) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
Upgrading xterm-179-5.i386.
Upgrading comps-1.90-0.20040204.i386.
This only took the first two CDs to install. 143 updates were shown for
the development tree. (not installed). I can't get to the updates
channel because of web congestion and It kept my original sources file,
with my chosen mirror.
I'll try the fresh install tomorrow. Just curious as to the development
to Fed2 - test1 route.
Jim
20 years, 4 months
new test release
by loop
Hi will there be a dvd.iso of this test release or is there a way to make me
an dvd-iso of the four images mysself, would be nice to be able to just use
one dvd-RW instead of 4 cd-rws to install the release
Greetz mike
20 years, 4 months
Main Menu anomaly
by Gerry Tool
If you click on the Main Menu icon, select System Tools > More System Tools,
instead of a list of applications, you get a list of the screen saver
modules. Bug # 115503.
Gerry Tool
20 years, 4 months