On Mar 23, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
Am 22.03.2012 um 18:20 schrieb Ian Springer:
> Besides the inconsistency in what it means to be a server, there's
> something else about having all these non-top-level server types that
> annoys me on a regular basis. When I go the Inventory > Servers, I want
> to get a nice listing of all the server processes in my inventory.
But that is only because the query language is not able to say (non) top-level
server.
But that's the point - afaik there's no concept of 'top/non-top' level. I
suppose you might include a predicate where you filter on parent types of platform, but
firming the conceptual model of the existing types seems a more effective path.