+1
Le 18/04/2013 23:26, Larry O'Leary a écrit :
I like rhqctl myself.
Of course, I still do not understand why the .sh extension is used. .sh
indicates that the script is an include or should be passed to a shell
using:
. rhqctl.sh
source rhqctl.sh
Or:
sh rhqctl.sh
bash rhqctl.sh
Where as: "rhqctl" (no extension with execute attribute set) on *nix
allows one to use the same command on Windows and *nix platforms:
Linux:
./rhqctl start
Windows
rhqctl start
And documentation no longer has to say rhqctl.[sh|cmd].
Any way, just one of my pet peeves. :)