But, just to clarify, are the line #'s JavaScript line #'s, or are they
the original Java line #'s?
On 04/30/2012 04:46 PM, mike thompson wrote:
No, all options but the pure OBF give us stack trace line numbers.
So OBF is not an option for us right now, but the other 3 options are
all valid. The "pretty" gwt compile option gives us stack traces with
line numbers and the best size/performance characteristics with the
exception of pure OBF (that doesn't have the line numbers in stack trace).
My vote is for the "pretty" option.
On Apr 30, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Ian Springer wrote:
> So the only thing that would give us the Java line numbers in stack
> traces is the OBF w/ emulated stack trace option, correct?
>
> On 04/30/2012 04:27 PM, mike thompson wrote:
>> The document is updated with initial load times and the "pretty" gwt
>> compile option.
>>
>> This "pretty" option seems like the best price/performance that
>> enables stack traces. It is faster than Detailed and OBF w/ Emulated
>> stack trace but slower than OBF. *It is the fastest/smallest option
>> with Stack Traces*
>>
>> Link to report:
>>
http://www.evernote.com/shard/s8/sh/b273049d-4387-41f0-a65a-75ff57e230a2/...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rhq-devel mailing list
>> rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
>
>
> --
> Ian Springer
> Principal Software Developer
> JBoss Operations Network
> Red Hat
> ian.springer(a)redhat.com
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> <mailto:rhq-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
--
Ian Springer
Principal Software Developer
JBoss Operations Network
Red Hat
ian.springer(a)redhat.com