Given you can't get formal "support" for RHQ, at least not from RH, how
about we just say something like: "Here is the list of *recommended* browsers for
RHQ4.3..." ?
Mike, what should that list be now after the various component upgrades?
Cheers
Charles
----- Original Message -----
From what I can see, we don't currently have anything in the RHQ
docs
about which browsers are supported. We should add something (perhaps
on
http://rhq-project.org/display/JOPR2/Prerequisites). Note, for RHQ,
"supported" means developers have used it and haven't noticed any
major
issues; this is obviously a different definition than what
"supported"
means for JON, and the list of supported browsers for JON will be a
subset of the list of browsers supported by RHQ.
On 02/22/2012 10:12 AM, mike thompson wrote:
> Now that RHQ is on GWT 2.4.0 and SmartGWT 3.0 the list of supported
> browsers has expanded. Will there be a formal change in browser
> version support as well?
>
>
> I say this noticing some peculiarities with Fire Fox 10, but it is
> not a supported browser so I'm not sure how much attention be
> given to it. However, reality is most likely that our users
> outside of RHEL will be on FF10 and not FF3.6.
>
> Thoughts and opinions on this?
> _______________________________________________
> rhq-devel mailing list
> rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel
--
Ian Springer
Principal Software Developer
JBoss Operations Network
Red Hat
ian.springer(a)redhat.com
_______________________________________________
rhq-devel mailing list
rhq-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/rhq-devel