-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/2015 10:18 AM, Thomas Segismont wrote:
Eventually, we need to consider the impact on integration with KC.
Indeed. I'm not sure how is the state of Keycloak's support for web
sockets, but I can dig a bit if that's the way we are heading.
- - Juca.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUt7XoAAoJECKM1e+fkPrXlRgH/RcL9WJSNF6zXMdXyqxrLFZ6
NhmWCz6VQMLTK9llr/LjfNcubNc33YR3eHZEXRrJeFNyacX/fLdr3+GbBRqXnYQM
HvoCksOpQno9aSTms6r40PjBdIfCNpPPoqGKByGhcONRYVvxWGmwxVRmi7KOaape
ie/tkQOaYqJOYRWVzy+GWTlQ4cfILubQNVLk/O5gYx+rJ+GAHZCRo1m/RaB3VePE
aOj+zk/Skt9VU/1KO88FZyFQt4Jo39qZq183SLCOYMirNi/frBX43ReZHXGl7ahu
56muNxEx1g9q8FBssXaOpoEft4UUon3kGQPTU7SFo2v101fsn0yEkB1O/ZXy6d0=
=6E6D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----