----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Flink" <tflink(a)redhat.com>
To: qa-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 1:53:56 AM
Subject: Packaging for Fedora
After a bit of miscommunication, I think we're finally on the same page
as Infra in terms of getting QA tools packaged.
I've made a commitment to have everything packaged in Fedora before
F25. In return, they've agreed to let us continue to update the infra
repo with non-koji-built RPMs until that time.
Sounds good. Thanks for communicating that with the infra folks.
Even though it's not as immediate of an issue anymore, I still
want to
start making progress on this instead of waiting until the last minute;
there are plenty of things to package and it's still going to take
time to get done.
The biggest problem I see is the 777 dirs in the libtaskotron package.
I've proposed two solutions in that ticket [1] but more input (and/or
solutions) would be more than welcome.
Replied in the ticket.
> I've requested a qadevel-sig (the '-sig' part is required) group in
> pkgdb [2] to manage ACLs for the packages and be the default assignee in
> bugzilla so we don't have to worry about who's the primary POC.
>
> This isn't a "drop whatever you're doing and fix this now" but
let's
> get it done so we can get rid of the copr and start working on other
> things :)
>
> Tim
>
>
> [1]
https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T779
> [2]
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5269
>
> _______________________________________________
> qa-devel mailing list
> qa-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>