On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:23:33 -0600
Tim Flink <tflink(a)redhat.com> wrote:
After looking at the jobstats on autoqa-stg over the last day or so
since I changed all of the clients to be fc18, I'm happy enough with
the completion rates to suggest that we upgrade production autoqa and
get rid of our fc17 clients.
I suppose that actually including those numbers might help. They do
include a bunch of fc19 runs that were before I switched all of the
clients over to fc18
raw data:
http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/autoqa/jobstats/20130726_jobstats-stg.txt
summary data:
http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/autoqa/jobstats/20130726_jobstats-stg_summ...
running stats on 20130726_jobstats-stg.txt
Global Stats
============
1715 Jobs
- 1042 fc18
- 672 fc19
Crashes
-------
271 Crashes
- 61 fc18
- 210 fc19
Passes
-------
1443 Passes
- 981 fc18
- 462 fc19
Test Specific Stats
===================
depcheck
266 runs ( 136 GOOD, 130 ERROR )
- 136 fc18 runs ( 136 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 130 fc19 runs ( 0 GOOD, 130 ERROR )
repoclosure
214 runs ( 214 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 98 fc18 runs ( 98 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 116 fc19 runs ( 116 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
rpmguard
488 runs ( 488 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 346 fc18 runs ( 346 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 142 fc19 runs ( 142 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
rpmlint
485 runs ( 485 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 346 fc18 runs ( 346 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 139 fc19 runs ( 139 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
upgradepath
48 runs ( 48 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 18 fc18 runs ( 18 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 30 fc19 runs ( 30 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
conflicts
213 runs ( 72 GOOD, 141 ERROR )
- 98 fc18 runs ( 37 GOOD, 61 ERROR )
- 115 fc19 runs ( 35 GOOD, 80 ERROR )