It has nothing to do with your specific question, but there may be
another reason to pull roundcubemail from EPEL-4: it requires PHP5 since
version 0.2.
I didn't have a look at the packages, but here you go...
Given that 0.2 fixes some XSS issues, I think that's wise. Thanks!
Steven
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 14:42 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Any suggestions, anyone? Am I better off just pulling roundcubemail
> from
> EL-4?
>
> ---------------------------- Original Message
> ----------------------------
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies in EPEL - 2008-07-13]
> From: "Joe Orton" <jorton(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, July 14, 2008 1:40 pm
> To: "Jon Ciesla" <limb(a)jcomserv.net>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:30:35AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >
> > > php-pear is a subpackage of php in (base) RHEL4. Not sure what your
> exact question is, so I can't tell whether that's the right answer :)
> > >
> > > joe
> > >
> > Essentially, when I try to build php-pear-Mail-Mime in EPEL-4, mock
> fails with:
> > ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for php-pear >=
> 1:1.4.11-1.el4s1.1. Exiting.
> >
> > php-pear is at least 4.3.9. Why would this happen?
>
> 4.3.9 at epoch 0 is less than 1.4.11 at epoch 1.
>
> I've no idea whether the Fedora-style PEAR packages will work with the
> RHEL4 php-pear, in any case. I'd suggest you bring this up on
> fedora-php-devel-list.
>
> joe
>
>
> --
> novus ordo absurdum
>
>
>
--
novus ordo absurdum