Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948
Ant Bryan <anthonybryan(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-25 14:20:45 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
rpmlint output:
mulk-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/mulk-0.4.1/src/uri_parser.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
- Fix this in setup phase.
Thanks, I had not been using rpmlint on debuginfo packages.
rpmlint mulk-0.4.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm mulk-debuginfo-0.4.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Add THANKS and TODO.
Done!
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
Fix the above before import to CVS. The package has been
APPROVED
Thanks for your time and help, Jussi! I think the package upstream has been
improved and your comments will make it easier for mulk to be packaged
elsewhere too!
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: mulk
Short Description: Multi-connection network downloader with Metalink support
Owners: ant
Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11
InitialCC:
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.