https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576792
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms> ---
(In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #11)
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #8)
> > The policy is still to make a subpackage even if you only make a python3
> > version. I asked about this a few moths back on IRC.
>
> Can you please provide the reference to this in the guidelines.
It is in the Python naming guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_naming
There's an exception for packages in EPEL only [*] with python3 but in RHEL
with python2, in such a case the (eventually) later requested Fedora [**]
branches need to get retired. But as this request was filed against Fedora in
general, I assume there's a wish for a package also in Fedora.
Did you check if there's anything similiar, available already or in RHEL?
[*]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/EPEL7_Python3#Packaging_Paral...
[**]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/EPEL7_Python3#Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component