Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~ynemoy/xmonad/xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~ynemoy/xmonad/ghc681-xmonad-contrib-0.5-1.fc8.src.r... Description: Third party tiling algorithms, configurations and scripts to xmonad, a tiling window manager for X.
For an introduction to building, configuring and using xmonad extensions, see "XMonad.Doc". In particular:
"XMonad.Doc.Configuring", a guide to configuring xmonad
"XMonad.Doc.Extending", using the contributed extensions library
"XMonad.Doc.Developing", introduction to xmonad internals and writing your own extensions.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
------- Additional Comments From petersen@redhat.com 2008-02-12 22:05 EST ------- I guess the naming guidelines need to be fleshed out/discussed on the coming fedora-haskell-list but the name of the srpm and the spec file must coincide anyway. Given this is a library, ghc-xmonad-contrib is probably right anyway.
(FWIW I made a package too the other day at home, but forgot to upload it.)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |426753
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
------- Additional Comments From loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2008-07-03 06:17 EST ------- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm
This update is compliant with the Draft Guidelines, which are under review. Reviewing this will help poke holes in the Guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2008-09-02 23:12:09 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.7-2.fc9.src.rpm
This is a second example of a library only package.
The macros needed are currently available on the wiki and need to be installed manually for now. There is a bug to have them included in ghc directly. I will add it to the blockers. Don't forget to --copyin them to mock, and then use --no-clean to do the build.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |460304
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Bug 426754 depends on bug 460304, which changed state.
Bug 460304 Summary: Add macros to GHC for packaging cabal packages for GHC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460304
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426750
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426752
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-01-21 22:35:28 EDT --- Let's pick this one up too
SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rp...
Only builds in rawhide for now.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-02-24 21:27:15 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-03-02 11:40:52 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Till Maas opensource@till.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource@till.name
--- Comment #7 from Till Maas opensource@till.name 2009-03-31 05:59:34 EDT --- ghc-X11-xft and ghc-utf8-string seem not to be required by this package, but this review requests depends on their review requests. The review requests are also not in a reviewable state, can they be closed? Bugs: #426750 #426752
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Bug 426754 depends on bug 426753, which changed state.
Bug 426753 Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-05-18 22:27:37 EDT --- For impatient users waiting, in the meantime you can install xmonad-contrib in your a/c using "cabal install xmonad-contrib".
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-05-18 23:25:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7)
ghc-X11-xft and ghc-utf8-string seem not to be required by this package
Well it is true that you can build xmonad-contrib without them since they are optional build deps, but various modules do require XMonad.Util.Font for xft support.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #10 from Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com 2009-06-07 21:34:37 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm's maybe this can help things along.
http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #11 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-06-16 20:08:42 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-5.fc10.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Bug 426754 depends on bug 426750, which changed state.
Bug 426750 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-20 19:47:59 EDT --- Zach, maybe we can let Yaakov have this one. ;-) I think he would be happy to have you as comaintainer if that works for you.
Yaakov: I assume you meant http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-5.fc11.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-06-20 19:50:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12)
http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-5.fc11.src.rp...
srpm looks broken (only 4kB) - partial upload?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #14 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-06-21 10:47:57 EDT --- Blame Dolphin. This KDE switch hasn't been 100% smooth. I sent it up with SCP this time.
Zach, let's comaintain.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #15 from Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com 2009-06-22 18:31:13 EDT --- Sounds good to me, the only reason I started was your link was dead, and I needed it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-25 20:16:30 EDT --- It is much easier for reviewers if you clearly post the updated spec and srpm urls with each update: the spec file still seems to be from March...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-26 00:32:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358666) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358666) ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec-1.patch
clean and fix requires and BRs
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1634104
Since ghc-X11-xft is ready maybe we can drop the xft bcond though
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-26 00:33:28 EDT --- If you update the urls I will try to pick with the review and hope we have this timely. :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-26 00:34:36 EDT --- ugh, take 2:
If you update the urls I will try to pick up the review and hope we can finish this timely. :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #20 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-08-27 11:32:35 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-7.fc10.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |petersen@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-27 12:26:51 EDT --- Presumably: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-7.fc11.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-27 12:34:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358906) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358906) more -doc deps
I think to be consistent we better have all the doc deps too.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-27 12:36:07 EDT --- Erm, and:
+BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #24 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-08-28 11:13:47 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11.src.rp...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-08-31 06:33:05 EDT --- * Thu Aug 27 2009 Yaakov M. Nemoy ynemoy@fedoraproject.org - 0.8.1-7 - removed bcond since xft will be in fedora soon
Ok, I'll wait for ghc-X11-xft to get into rawhide before completing this review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #26 from Zach Oglesby oglesbyzm@gmail.com 2009-09-11 11:52:04 EDT --- ghc-X11-xft is in rawhide now...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Bug 426754 depends on bug 426752, which changed state.
Bug 426752 Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-17 21:04:11 EDT --- Thanks, Zach
I hope Yaakov is still interested in this now that he seems hooked on bluetile... ;)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #28 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-09-18 04:54:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27)
Thanks, Zach
I hope Yaakov is still interested in this now that he seems hooked on bluetile... ;)
A) we need this for bluetile too, were i hooked on it
2) I still use xmonad, bluetile is just for newbs, and imo does it right.
D) Can the review go forward please or is there something you all need from me?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-20 05:20:23 EDT --- Sure, it's all good - just wanted to clarify your intentions and think we also did that on irc. Didn't want to end up with a "dead" package here. :)
Here is the review:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable
MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint output
Please fix:
ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: invalid-license BSD3 ghc-xmonad-contrib.src: W: strange-permission xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz 0777 ghc-xmonad-contrib-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-xmonad-contrib library. (need a line break)
Waived:
ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-xmonad-contrib-devel ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-xmonad-contrib-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/xmonad-contrib-0.8.1/libHSxmonad-contrib-0.8.1_p.a
[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [=] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
See above rpmlint
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release
03f74fda270aca759407787da73e50d9 xmonad-contrib-0.8.1.tar.gz
[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
Please fix the 3 rpmlint issues before importing to CVS.
Package is APPROVED by petersen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-09-20 05:26:07 EDT --- For reference here is the cabal2spec-diff output (on my copy of a fixed spec file)
--- ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec 2009-09-20 19:01:57.000000000 +1000 +++ ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec.cabal2spec 2009-09-20 19:16:54.000000000 +1000 @@ -8,58 +8,35 @@
Name: ghc-%{pkg_name} Version: 0.8.1 -Release: 8%{?dist} -Summary: Third party extensions for xmonad +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Haskell %{pkg_name} library
Group: Development/Libraries -License: BSD +License: @LICENSE@ URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/%%7Bpkg_name%7D Source0: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/%%7Bpkg_name%7D/%%7Bversion%7D/%... BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) # fedora ghc archs: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-devel = %{version} -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-devel -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-devel BuildRequires: ghc, ghc-rpm-macros %if %{with doc} BuildRequires: ghc-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-doc -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-doc %endif %if %{with prof} BuildRequires: ghc-prof -BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-prof = %{version} -BuildRequires: ghc-utf8-string-prof -BuildRequires: ghc-X11-xft-prof %endif
%description -Haskell %{pkg_name} library for ghc-%{ghc_version}. - -Third party tiling algorithms, configurations and scripts to xmonad, -a tiling window manager for X. - -For an introduction to building, configuring and using xmonad -extensions, see "XMonad.Doc". In particular: +This package provides the Haskell %{pkg_name} library for ghc.
-"XMonad.Doc.Configuring", a guide to configuring xmonad - -"XMonad.Doc.Extending", using the contributed extensions library - -"XMonad.Doc.Developing", introduction to xmonad internals and writing -your own extensions.
%package devel Summary: Haskell %{pkg_name} library Group: Development/Libraries +Provides: ghc-%{pkg_name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc = %{ghc_version} Requires(preun): ghc = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-devel -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-devel -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-devel
%description devel This package contains the development files for %{name} @@ -73,13 +50,9 @@ Requires: ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} Requires(post): ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} Requires(postun): ghc-doc = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-doc -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-doc -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-doc
%description doc -This package contains development documentation files for -the %{name} library. +This package contains development documentation files for the %{name} library. %endif
@@ -89,9 +62,6 @@ Group: Development/Libraries Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} Requires: ghc-prof = %{ghc_version} -Requires: ghc-xmonad-prof -Requires: ghc-utf8-string-prof -Requires: ghc-X11-xft-prof
[BTW I plan to reverse the diff output in the next cabal2spec since that makes more sense now.]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #31 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroublond@gmail.com 2009-09-22 05:45:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-xmonad-contrib Short Description: Third party extensions for xmonad Owners: ynemoy petersen bos Branches: F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-09-22 12:36:03 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-24 18:00:01 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-29 10:38:26 EDT --- ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-8.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522821(bluetile)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|460304 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #35 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-10-07 00:19:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-xmonad-contrib Short Description: Third party extensions for xmonad Owners: mathstuf petersen bos Branches: el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-10-08 16:25:53 EDT --- You mean a package change request here right? Not a new package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #37 from Ben Boeckel mathstuf@gmail.com 2010-10-08 17:34:30 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-xmonad-contrib New Branches: el6 Owners: mathstuf petersen bos InitialCC: haskell-sig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754
--- Comment #38 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-10-10 00:20:13 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org