https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Bug ID: 1247251 Summary: Review Request: xfce-polkit - Simple PolicyKit authentication agent for Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: projects.rg@smart.ms QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/polkit/xfce-polkit.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/polkit/xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717git... Description: Simple PolicyKit authentication agent for Xfce Fedora Account System Username: raphgro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |williamjmorenor@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |williamjmorenor@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g | |mail.com)
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Hi William, thanks for your interest to do this review. Are there any issues to fix?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g | |mail.com) |
--- Comment #2 from William Moreno williamjmorenor@gmail.com --- Package Aproved ===============
Test Builds: s390: http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1939901 arm: http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3147745 ppc: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2724880 koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10874068
===== MUST items ===== C/C++: Pass: Package does not contain kernel modules. Pass: Package contains no static executables. Pass: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) Pass: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic: Pass: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Pass: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Pass: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. Pass: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. Pass: Changelog in prescribed format. Pass: Sources contain only permissible code or content. NA: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. NA: Development files must be in a -devel package Pass: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. Pass: Package consistently uses macros Pass: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Pass: Package does not generate any conflict. Pass: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. NA: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. Pass: Requires correct, justified where necessary. Pass: Spec file is legible and written in American English. Pass: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. Pass: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. Pass: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. Pass: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. Pass: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines Pass: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Pass: Package installs properly. Pass: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Pass: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Pass: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Pass: Package must own all directories that it creates. Pass: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Pass: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Pass: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Pass: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Pass: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. Pass: Dist tag is present. Pass: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. Pass: Permissions on files are set properly. Pass: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. Pass: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. Pass: Package does not use a name that already exists. Pass: Package is not relocatable. Pass: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Pass: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. Pass: File names are valid UTF-8. Pass: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: Pass: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Pass: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). Pass: Package functions as described. Pass: Latest version is packaged. Pass: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. Pass: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Pass: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. NA: %check is present and all tests pass. Pass: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. Pass: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file Pass: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag Pass: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Pass: Buildroot is not present Pass: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Pass: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. Pass: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. Pass: SourceX is a working URL. Pass: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: Pass: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Pass: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Pass: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Pass: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Pass: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc21.x86_64.rpm xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc21.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: xfce-polkit-debuginfo-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc21.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- xfce-polkit.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/ncopa/xfce-polkit <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> xfce-polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/ncopa/xfce-polkit <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Requires -------- xfce-polkit (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpolkit-agent-1.so.0()(64bit) libpolkit-gobject-1.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libxfce4ui-1.so.0()(64bit) libxfce4util.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides -------- xfce-polkit: xfce-polkit xfce-polkit(x86-64)
Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/ncopa/xfce-polkit/archive/be888ee7d1d87d892b2fdef00045061... : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 7598eb7537029e7bed12da73640a7ceb4b93e9f4a85694c8061e28096b89087c CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 7598eb7537029e7bed12da73640a7ceb4b93e9f4a85694c8061e28096b89087c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Thanks!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: xfce-polkit Short Description: Simple PolicyKit authentication agent for Xfce Upstream URL: https://github.com/ncopa/xfce-polkit Owners: raphgro Branches: f23 f22 f21 epel7 InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |xfce-polkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14581
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14583
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14585
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7849
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1201124
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201124 [Bug 1201124] Essential Xfce package missing from EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce-polkit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7849
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce-polkit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14583
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce-polkit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14581
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce-polkit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14585
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc | |22 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2015-09-12 20:49:09
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc |0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc |22 |21
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- xfce-polkit-0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247251
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.el |0-0.1.20130717gitbe888ee.fc |7 |23
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org