Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Summary: Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrceresa@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/akonadi-googledata.spec SRPM URL: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/akonadi-googledata-1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This are the akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts. Together with libgcal ( Bug 551258 ) enable every akonadi based application to read/write contacts and calendar from google and google apps accounts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Mario Ceresa mrceresa@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady
--- Comment #1 from Mario Ceresa mrceresa@gmail.com 2009-12-29 13:39:46 EDT --- Added the NotReady status because it requires package ligcal which is waiting for review under Bug 551258.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2009-12-29 13:59:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1)
Added the NotReady status because it requires package ligcal which is waiting for review under Bug 551258.
In fact, we add NotReady only when package has some obvious issues, preventing it from being reviewed formally.
In this case, you need to properly add dependent and blocking tickets. See the top of his page - "Depends on:" and "Blocks" editboxes.
So, please, clear NotReady tag (of course, if no technical issues with this package exists) and add blocking/dependent tickets instead.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter@math.unl.edu Depends on| |551258 Status Whiteboard|NotReady |
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu 2009-12-29 14:01:13 EDT --- done
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux@googlemail.co | |m
--- Comment #4 from leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com 2010-01-16 16:29:09 EST --- The source url is wrong
Source0: http://libcal.googlecode.com/files/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.bz2
it should be
Source0: http://libgcal.googlecode.com/files/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.bz2
This could be shortened
%doc COPYING %doc README %doc ChangeLog
to
%doc COPYING README ChangeLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |leigh123linux@googlemail.co | |m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #5 from Mario Ceresa mrceresa@gmail.com 2010-01-21 10:25:51 EST --- @Peter, Rex thanks a lot for explaining and fixing the Blocks/Depends! @Scott, thanks for your comment, I'll check and fix it soon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Jens Maucher jensm@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jensm@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #6 from Jens Maucher jensm@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-06 15:59:51 EST --- You can drop the %{?dist} macro from changelog entries.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu 2010-04-09 10:22:59 EDT --- setting fedora-review flag , marking assigned.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #8 from Mario Ceresa mrceresa@gmail.com 2010-04-23 06:44:32 EDT --- Hello everybody, as libgcal has been approved, I'm going to test again the package to see if it builds correctly. News will follow :)
Mario
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #9 from S.A. Hartsuiker sahartsu@xs4all.nl 2010-06-02 01:26:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=418909) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=418909) patch to .spec to get it to build
The original .spec is FTBFS. I needed this package, so I thought I'd share my spec changes. I take no responsibility for fedora guideline adherence or anything else of the sort.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-07 11:09:25 EDT --- If you're not interested any more i would take the packages over. I have them already packaged since a long time and in my repo. People are asking for it.
Once you're the maintainer of it i hope you will maintain them more contemporary than here.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #11 from Mario Ceresa mrceresa@gmail.com 2010-06-28 04:51:45 EDT --- Hello Thomas!
I'm very sorry for how slow the work on this package went on: if you are willing to help I'd be more than happy to let you step in.
Please tell me if you are still interested to take over the package and what can I do to ease the process.
Best regards,
Mario
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-06-28 05:46:50 EDT --- Quite easy. I finish the review request, means i will make a new SRPM with a fixed spec. nothing to do here for you.
You release the ownership for libgcal there: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgcal and i take it over. Done.
Thank you.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #13 from Mario Ceresa mrceresa@gmail.com 2010-06-28 09:41:23 EDT --- Hello Thomas, I just did what you asked and released the ownership of libgcal: please let me know if there is anything else I can do :)
Thanks and regards,
Mario
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|leigh123linux@googlemail.co |nobody@fedoraproject.org |m |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Bug 551274 depends on bug 551258, which changed state.
Bug 551258 Summary: Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flag|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu 2010-08-06 21:47:48 EDT --- Oh gosh, I had set review flag, though I've not followed-through, sorry. resetting so someone else can jump in to finish the review.
(My apologies, been very short on time/energy of late, I may be able to jump in to help finish this at some later date).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-07 15:19:32 EDT --- I have to say sorry as well. Was busy with my move and fixing bugs for F-14. Will build and update this review tomorrow.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-08 13:36:26 EDT --- SPEC Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/akonadi-googledata.spec SRPM Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0-1.fc13.src....
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2388353
[thomas@tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint akonadi-googledata.spec ../SRPMS/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/akonadi-googledata-*1.1.0* akonadi-googledata.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: http://libgcal.googlecode.com/files/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found akonadi-googledata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kde -> ked, de, ode akonadi-googledata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US google -> Google, goggle, googly akonadi-googledata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US joe -> Joe, hoe, jor akonadi-googledata.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://libgcal.googlecode.com/files/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kde -> ked, de, ode akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US google -> Google, goggle, googly akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US joe -> Joe, hoe, jor akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_gcal_resource akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_googledata_resource akonadi-googledata-debuginfo.x86_64: E: world-writable /usr/src/debug/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0/contacts/ui_GoogleData.h 0666L akonadi-googledata-debuginfo.x86_64: E: world-writable /usr/src/debug/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0/calendar/ui_GoogleData.h 0666L 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 10 warnings.
I haven't found the solution for world-writeable yet.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #17 from leigh scott leigh123linux@googlemail.com 2010-08-08 17:17:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16)
I haven't found the solution for world-writeable yet.
Try
%cmake \ -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=OFF \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING="Release" \ -DLIBGCAL_INCLUDE_DIR=%{_includedir}/libgcal make %{?_smp_mflags} chmod 644 contacts/ui_GoogleData.h calendar/ui_GoogleData.h
%install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} %find_lang akonadi_gcal_resource
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-11 03:57:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #16)
I haven't found the solution for world-writeable yet.
Try
%cmake \ -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=OFF \ -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING="Release" \ -DLIBGCAL_INCLUDE_DIR=%{_includedir}/libgcal make %{?_smp_mflags} chmod 644 contacts/ui_GoogleData.h calendar/ui_GoogleData.h
%install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} %find_lang akonadi_gcal_resource
Yeah, that workaround does it. I was trying to find the setting in the source, but it's fine with that as well. Thanks Leigh.
SPEC Url: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/akonadi-googledata.spec SRPM Url:http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0-2.fc13.src....
[thomas@tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint akonadi-googledata.spec ../SRPMS/akonadi-googledata-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/akonadi-googledata-*1.1.0* akonadi-googledata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kde -> ked, de, ode akonadi-googledata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US joe -> Joe, hoe, jor akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US kde -> ked, de, ode akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US joe -> Joe, hoe, jor akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_gcal_resource akonadi-googledata.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary akonadi_googledata_resource 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #19 from Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com 2010-09-09 03:47:29 EDT --- Created attachment 446157 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446157 Output error from rpmbuild -bb akonadi-googledata.spec
Any hints for compiling at my F13 x86_64, updated as of today? I downloads source rpm at the link provided.... Thanks, Gianluca
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com
--- Comment #20 from Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com 2010-09-09 04:19:40 EDT --- Hello, the problem was due to not having gcc-c++ installed. After that now buildes ok.
Originally I tried: rpmbuild -bb akonadi-googledata.spec
and it said I needed akonadi-devel, libgcal-devel, kdepimlibs-devel
So I did: yum install akonadi-devel libgcal-devel kdepimlibs-devel
The dependency tree gave the packages below but not gcc-c++: Installed: akonadi-devel.x86_64 0:1.3.1-4.fc13 kdepimlibs-devel.x86_64 0:4.4.5-1.fc13 libgcal-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.5-1.fc13
Dependency Installed: attica-devel.x86_64 0:0.1.2-2.fc13 autoconf.noarch 0:2.65-1.fc13 automake.noarch 0:1.11.1-1.fc13 automoc.x86_64 0:1.0-0.14.rc3.fc13 boost.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-date-time.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-devel.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-graph.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-iostreams.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-python.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-regex.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-serialization.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-signals.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-test.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 boost-wave.x86_64 0:1.41.0-9.fc13 bzip2-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.5-6.fc12 cmake.x86_64 0:2.8.0-3.fc13 fontconfig-devel.x86_64 0:2.8.0-1.fc13 freetype-devel.x86_64 0:2.3.11-3.fc13 gamin-devel.x86_64 0:0.1.10-7.fc13 kdelibs-devel.x86_64 6:4.4.5-1.fc13 keyutils-libs-devel.x86_64 0:1.2-6.fc12 krb5-devel.x86_64 0:1.7.1-10.fc13 libICE-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.6-2.fc13 libSM-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.0-7.fc12 libX11-devel.x86_64 0:1.3.1-3.fc13 libXScrnSaver-devel.x86_64 0:1.2.0-1.fc12 libXau-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.5-1.fc12 libXcomposite-devel.x86_64 0:0.4.1-2.fc13 libXcursor-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.10-4.fc13 libXdamage-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.2-2.fc13 libXext-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.2-2.fc13 libXfixes-devel.x86_64 0:4.0.4-2.fc13 libXft-devel.x86_64 0:2.1.14-1.fc13 libXi-devel.x86_64 0:1.3.2-1.fc13 libXinerama-devel.x86_64 0:1.1-2.fc13 libXpm-devel.x86_64 0:3.5.8-2.fc13 libXrandr-devel.x86_64 0:1.3.0-5.fc13 libXrender-devel.x86_64 0:0.9.5-1.fc13 libXt-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.7-1.fc13 libXtst-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.99.2-3.fc12 libXv-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.5-1.fc13 libXxf86misc-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.2-1.fc13 libXxf86vm-devel.x86_64 0:1.1.0-1.fc13 libacl-devel.x86_64 0:2.2.49-6.fc13 libattr-devel.x86_64 0:2.4.44-3.fc13 libcom_err-devel.x86_64 0:1.41.10-7.fc13 libcurl-devel.x86_64 0:7.20.1-4.fc13 libdrm-devel.x86_64 0:2.4.21-2.fc13 libidn-devel.x86_64 0:1.16-1.fc13 libjpeg-devel.x86_64 0:6b-46.fc12 libpng-devel.x86_64 2:1.2.44-1.fc13 libselinux-devel.x86_64 0:2.0.90-5.fc13 libsepol-devel.x86_64 0:2.0.41-3.fc13 libxcb-devel.x86_64 0:1.5-1.fc13 libxkbfile-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.6-2.fc13 mesa-libGL-devel.x86_64 0:7.8.1-8.fc13 mesa-libGLU-devel.x86_64 0:7.8.1-8.fc13 openssl-devel.x86_64 0:1.0.0a-1.fc13 phonon-devel.x86_64 0:4.4.2-1.fc13 qt-devel.x86_64 1:4.6.3-8.fc13 shared-desktop-ontologies-devel.noarch 0:0.4-1.fc13 soprano-devel.x86_64 0:2.4.3-2.fc13 strigi-devel.x86_64 0:0.7.2-5.fc13 xorg-x11-proto-devel.noarch 0:7.4-36.fc13
Probably gcc-c++ has to be added in rpmbuild requirements for akonadi-googledata.spec ?
Now I'll try the package itself...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-09 04:45:08 EDT --- Hint #1: Never compile stuff as root! You compile always as user and install the created packages then as root.
Dunno if that affects the building in your case or if you already compiled other stuff and broke something.
It compiles fine locally on my box F13, up-to-date with, updates, updates-testing plus unstable and testing kde-redhat repos enabled. It builds as well fine in koji. Grab the RPM from the following link:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2457094
BTW, you could as well grab the SRPM and run as your user: rpmbuild --rebuild akonadi-googledata-1.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm
Best regards Thomas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #22 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-09 04:49:27 EDT --- Ok, i expected you have the very least packages installed to build stuff.
Nope, there's no need to add gcc-c++ to the spec: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRequires
see the 'Exception' section.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #23 from Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cecchi@gmail.com 2010-09-09 05:29:44 EDT --- Yes I had the same error, also compiling as a normal user, due to missing gcc-c++. OK, I'm not an rpmbuild expert; I read about gcc-c++ as a minimal requirement: now I know it, thanks. Now I compiled fine as a normal user and then installed as root.
It works. Things tested: - my past and future entries already in gmail has been filled in korganizer at first sync (no pre-existing entries in korganizer, so not tested the other direction) - while in kmail, accept an invitation arrived from an MS Exchange user using Outlook (my exchange account in kmail is instead configured as an imap account) Value is added in korganizer and also in gmail. Also my iphone gets it automatically too (as it is synchronized with my gmail account too) - new entry created in korganizer and it flows inside gmail (and iphone for what it matters). Is there a delay set/customizable or should it be immediate as soon as the network connecton is available in my pc? - new entry created in gmail doesn't appear in korganizer (at least after some minutes). tried both close/open korganizer and using view--> refresh option in korganizer without success. Instead I see it at my iphone (configured not in push mode but that once I open calendar it synchronizes)
Let me know if there is some tweak from push configuration in direction
gmail ---> korganizer
First sync was ok, but not new events created in gmail... Going to test more things. let me know if you want me to test other ones.
My config is with stock fedora packages + virt-preview repo for fedora Some packages' detail:
kdepim-4.4.5-1.fc13.x86_64 libgcal-0.9.5-1.fc13.x86_64 akonadi-googledata-1.1.0-2.fc13.x86_64
let me know if you need other packages' versions.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2010-11-16 11:29:51 EST --- What's the status of this package? There's a whole lot of discussion above but I'm not sure if the package from comment 18 is the one that should be reviewed.
Unfortunately I'm probably the worst person to review this, not using gmail, but perhaps I can scare up someone from the KDE SIG.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-17 17:37:43 EST --- The package from comment 18 is indeed the one. I will update it tomorrow to the latest.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Rex Dieter rdieter@math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |656997(kde-reviews)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Janssen thomasj@fedoraproject.org 2010-11-25 05:35:51 EST --- SPEC: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/akonadi-googledata.spec SRPM: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/akonadi-googledata-1.2.0-1.fc14.src....
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krege@land.ru
--- Comment #27 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru 2010-12-03 07:12:00 EST --- Thomas, if you want to make request instead of Mario Ceresa, you should open new bug entry and mark this one as dublicate.
But befor you'l do that: You not need to mark boost as Requires, as it akonadi dependece. You not need to mark akonadi as Requires, as you have akonadi-devel in BuilRequires and it will be added automaticaly. It does not compiled on my F14 machine. Logs: http://fpaste.org/KCco/ You not need to define BuildRoot tag on current Fedora releases until you want this package in EPEL. You not need %clean section on current Fedora releases until you want this package in EPEL. You not need rm -rf of buildroot in the begin of %install section on current Fedora releases until you want this package in EPEL.
Just common sence: I don't think it is a good idea to use first person in description (I highly recommend... and so on).
And I will take thise review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #28 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru 2010-12-03 07:18:10 EST ---
You not need to mark boost as Requires, as it akonadi dependece.
Ah, ok, It is a akonadi-googledata dependence too. But still, you not need it as you will get it automaticaly.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #29 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru 2010-12-03 07:45:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #27)
It does not compiled on my F14 machine. Logs: http://fpaste.org/KCco/
Add explicitly in BuildRequires version for libgcal-devel >=0.9.6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #30 from Sergio Monteiro Basto sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org 2010-12-03 11:25:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #29)
(In reply to comment #27)
It does not compiled on my F14 machine. Logs: http://fpaste.org/KCco/
Add explicitly in BuildRequires version for libgcal-devel >=0.9.6
yeah , http://code.google.com/p/libgcal/issues/detail?id=73
akonadi-googledate-1.2.0 just build with libgcal-0.9.6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Nicolas Troncoso Carrere ntroncos@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ntroncos@gmail.com
--- Comment #31 from Nicolas Troncoso Carrere ntroncos@gmail.com 2011-01-09 15:05:16 EST --- What is the status of this package?
If it is approved it will be included in Fedora 15?
As testing goes, I built it for my Fedora 13, it appears to be working since I got full synchronization with google <-> and Akonadi/Kaddressbook.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-01-09 15:12:50 EST --- Somebody has to review the package before it can be included.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #33 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru 2011-01-10 01:12:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #32)
Somebody has to review the package before it can be included.
See comment #27.
Anybody wanted to take over this package have to open NEW review request and mark THIS one as DUPLICATE. One could use existing spec (keeping original %changelog) to make the process easier and faster.
I will take that new review request (as I said before).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|656997(kde-reviews) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2011-01-10 13:48:08
--- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-01-10 13:48:08 EST --- I'm just going to close this, then.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #35 from Nicolas Troncoso Carrere ntroncos@gmail.com 2011-01-10 14:34:52 EST --- I' willing to take over this package. Anything special I should do to make it possible?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #36 from Sergio Monteiro Basto sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org 2011-03-14 23:01:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35)
I' willing to take over this package. Anything special I should do to make it possible?
Open a new request ?!
Hi, have you open a new request here in bugzilla ? if yes tell us where please
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #37 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru 2011-03-23 05:49:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35)
I' willing to take over this package. Anything special I should do to make it possible?
1) Open new review request. 2) Mark this one as *dublicate* for your request.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Mario Santagiuliana mario@marionline.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario@marionline.it
--- Comment #38 from Mario Santagiuliana mario@marionline.it 2011-06-05 18:40:49 EDT --- Hi to all, I want to create new rpm package for akonadi-googledata. I create a srpm and a rpm for fedora 14 64 bit. Tomorrow I hope to create packages for other version and architecture.
You can check my work here: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/akonadi-googledata/
All work fine but when I start to use akonadi google calendar resource I obtain "Unable to fetch item from backend". I don't undestand why...
Can you please give me some feedback? I should open a new request here on bugzilla?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #39 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich krege@land.ru 2011-06-06 01:03:46 EDT --- Looking at your comment I would like to say 2 things:
1) Sure! 2) Finaly!
After openning new review request mark this one as dublicate, please.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
--- Comment #40 from Mario Santagiuliana mario@marionline.it 2011-06-06 08:23:49 EDT --- I open new request here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711058
I change the url of packages, they can be found here: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages
Please, give me some feedback, thank you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274
Nicola Soranzo nsoranzo@tiscali.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #41 from Nicola Soranzo nsoranzo@tiscali.it 2011-06-06 08:35:43 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 711058 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org