https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000829
Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|package-review(a)lists.fedora |
|project.org |
Flags|needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai |
|l.com) |
--- Comment #7 from Björn "besser82" Esser <bjoern.esser(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #5)
* This section from the spec is bogus and should be needs to be
removed:
# compress man-pages
pushd man3
gzip -9 *
popd
I nuked this inside the updated spec.
* Any proof for this package being BSD-licensed? The license file
contained
in this package is added by Björn, but I can't find any upstream evidence
linpack is actually licensed BSD. Googling also did not provide further
information.
http://www.netlib.org/linpack/archives/readme says:
Questions/comments should be directed to lapack(a)cs.utk.edu.
Looking on their archives [1] I see some question about this from a few
years ago, which was answered:
"Basically it is BSD."
The additional documentation from Universität Bayreuth was auto-generated
from the source-files, so I consider them covered by the same license as
the code-sources are. Same goes for the DQRDC2 routine which is a modified
version from LINPACK's original DQRDC routine.
I added some clarifing comments about that inside the spec.
* I prefer packages to install their docs into
/usr/share/doc/<package>.
Installing docs into <package>-doc seems quite nonsensical to me.
Is there any guideline telling me where the contents of a doc-subpkg has to be
located? There are a lot of packages providing the documentation from the
doc-subpkg inside <package>-doc:
* boost-doc
* gtk2-devel-docs
* kernel-doc
* xorg-x11-docs
Just to name a prominent few. So I would consider doing so is somehow common
pratice.
[1]
http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/archives/lapack/msg00301.html
#####
Updated package:
%changelog
* Mon Aug 26 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser(a)gmail.com> - 19990929-1
- added some detailed comments about licensing
- added DQRDC2 routine
- removed compression of man-pages during %%build
- added some pdf-documentation from CERN's public library
* Sun Aug 25 2013 Björn Esser <bjoern.esser(a)gmail.com> - 19880411-1
- Initial rpm release
Koji Builds:
el5:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853614
el6:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853620
F18:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853624
F19:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853627
F20:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853635
Frh:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5853639
Urls:
Spec URL:
http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/linpack.spec
SRPM URL:
http://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/linpack-19990929-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hlgNnBAzpa&a=cc_unsubscribe