https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256736
Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com> ---
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License is ok
Description is ok
URL and Source0 are ok
All tests passed
BuildRequires are ok
$ rpm -qp --requires perl-meta-0.004-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep
-v rpmlib
1 perl-libs
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.38.2)
1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.14.0
1 perl(warnings)
1 perl(XSLoader)
1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
Binary requires are Ok.
$ rpm -qp --provides perl-meta-0.004-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c
1 perl(meta) = 0.004
1 perl-meta = 0.004-1.fc40
1 perl-meta(x86-64) = 0.004-1.fc40
Binary provides are Ok.
$ rpmlint ./perl-meta*
==================================== rpmlint session starts
===================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 4
perl-meta.x86_64: E: shared-library-without-dependency-information
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/meta/meta.so
perl-meta-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation
===== 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings, 1 badness; has
taken 0.3 s ====
Rpmlint is ok
TODO: Please consider to use macro style %{optflags} for optimization flags
as for build root.
The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines.
Resolution:
Approved
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256736
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...