Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455500
--- Comment #11 from Matthew Woehlke <mw_triad(a)users.sourceforge.net> 2008-08-07
14:53:59 EDT ---
We can get the review rolling with a pre-review, even before you
organize the
fedoraproject account.
I have an account, but the CLA may need to go through my company's legal
dept... otherwise so far I haven't done anything but create it.
And you should be referring to the process in:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
so please post the .spec and .src.rpm somewhere on the web, and explicitly
provide
the links in this bug,
The .spec is already here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729
I don't have anywhere to put the SRPM (and/or haven't figured out / set up
FAS), but it's easily created:
cd ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES ; wget
http://www.opengtl.org/download/OpenGTL-0.9.4.tar.bz2
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; wget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313729
cd ~/rpmbuild/SPECS ; rpmbuild -bs OpenGTL.spec
(in appropriate directories, of course)
Or, is 163k small enough to just dump the SRPM in here as an attachment, also?
in the requested format, ie with description,
and rpmlint
status.
D'oh! Sorry about that! Trying again...
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ echo *
OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-debuginfo-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
OpenGTL-devel-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm OpenGTL-libs-0.9.4-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64$ rpmlint *
OpenGTL-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
OpenGTL-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS$ rpmlint OpenGTL-0.9.4-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
I'm not sure if the no-documentation warning is interesting? Should I just copy
the same doc to -devel, -libs? Or is there a "normal" way to handle this
I'm
not familiar with?
Other than the above warnings, I've tried to follow the specs as close as
possible (and as far as I can tell, I'm ok w.r.t. the ReviewGuidelines
checklist), but as you know this is still my first package, so I'm still
feeling my way around :-).
Note: I can't conveniently test with mock right now as I'm on x86_64 (see
blocking bug 455502). I'm building locally with a fixed llvm package from
Cyrille Berger. When I get time, I'll test it on my other (i686) machine that
should build with the current rawhide llvm package.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.