Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activerecord2.3 - rails 2 alongside rails 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activerecord2.3 - rails 2 alongside rails 3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: codehotter@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: ---
Spec URL: http://xls01.freecult.org/pkg/?p=pkg.git;a=blob_plain;f=SPECS/rubygem-active... SRPM URL: http://xls01.freecult.org/pkg/?p=pkg.git;a=blob_plain;f=SRPMS/rubygem-active...
Changelog: http://xls01.freecult.org/pkg/?p=pkg.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/rails23
Description: rubygem-activerecord2.3 is a dependency of rails 2.3. (another dependency is rubygem-rdoc, which was built for Fedora 16 by mmorsi. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=254306 )
Although rails 3 was released, and Fedora 15 has moved to rails 3, there are still rails projects working with rails 2.3 series. Rails 3 is not backwards compatible and some key features are not yet working in rails 3. One notable project still on rails 2.3 is the issue tracker redmine: http://www.redmine.org.
Since rails 2 and rails 3 are perfectly parallel installable, I would like to maintain rails 2.3 series in Fedora until it really becomes obsolete. I have built these rails 2.3.12 packages starting from the rails 2.3.8 rpms already in Fedora 14.
This is my first time packaging for Fedora and I am welcoming feedback. Thank you for your time.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |726690
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |728256
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |728248
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
--- Comment #1 from Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com 2011-11-28 05:36:11 EST --- Direct link to current source RPM: http://xls01.freecult.org/pkg/?p=pkg.git;a=blob_plain;f=SRPMS/rubygem-active...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Bug 728249 depends on bug 728256, which changed state.
Bug 728256 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activesupport2.3 - rails 2 alongside rails 3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728256
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
--- Comment #2 from Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com 2012-01-09 06:06:33 EST --- This package will probably not work on F16 and F17. It requires rubygem-sqlite3-ruby which was renamed to rubygem-sqlite3. I will upload updated srpms shortly.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728249
Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Last Closed| |2012-05-07 11:17:43
--- Comment #3 from Emanuel Rietveld codehotter@gmail.com 2012-05-07 11:17:43 EDT --- With the move to ruby 1.9, making rails 2.3 compatible has become much more difficult in recent Fedora releases. Additionally, several projects requiring rails 2.3 previously now support rails 3, including redmine. I am abandoning this effort.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org