Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Fedora Directory Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228555
------- Additional Comments From dennis(a)ausil.us 2007-02-14 10:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
* source files match upstream - no differences found when comparing
included
tarball with tarball generated by included script
! package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
Perhaps should use just GPL as the license tag?
I was told that
its fine as thats what it is
E: fedora-ds dir-or-file-in-tmp /var/tmp/fedora-ds
Is this directory really needed?
per instance run time files go inside that dir
W: fedora-ds log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/fedora-ds
Is there something built into the directory server to rotate log files?
FDS handles
its own log rotation
I think that these can be ignored, rpmlint doesn't seem to handle
this case
appropriately
I agree
Other notes:
* "-p" should be used to preserve timestamps when installing
slapi-plugin.h
I agree
* Include a comment near the "Source0" line that indicates
that the
"fedora-ds-cvs.sh" script should be used to generate the tarball.
* Release should be 0.1.%{cvsdate}%{?dist}
Guidelines dont mention where the disttag should go in this case. I think its
fine as is.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.