Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710905
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2011-08-24 13:14:19 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> looks *really* odd. Did you get an rpmlint warning about text in
the wrong
> encoding? I'm not a PostScript expert, but I'd leave these files as-is.
You are right, it is wrong.
But now I get the following lint warnings:
octave-optim.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/octave/packages/optim-1.0.16/doc/figures/2D_slice-3.eps2
octave-optim.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/octave/packages/optim-1.0.16/doc/figures/optim_tutorial_slice.eps
I think these warnings are bogus, they are coming from a binary portion of the
eps file.
Yes. rpmlint often causes false alarms.
> MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the
actual license.
> NEEDSWORK
Well, the DESCRIPTION file contained in the source archive lists GFDL as well
as GPLv2+, so that's why it is listed in the RPM license field as well.
OK. Now I see that optim-mini-howto-2.lyx specifies that it is under the GFDL.
But I also now notice that many files that were not examined by licensecheck
specify GPLv3+. So the correct tag is
License: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and GFDL.
I don't see the point in shipping a LyX file (or the Makefile!), so you should
compile the documentation by adding
BuildRequires: tex(latex)
and running
make -C doc DVIPDF=dvipdf optim-mini-howto-2.pdf
in %build.
Then, at the end of %install run
rm -rf %{octpkgdir}/doc
to get rid of the unnecessary stuff, and add
%doc doc/optim-mini-howto-2.pdf doc/development/interfaces.txt
> Please add a '-v' flag in the Makefile, so that the
commands used in the build
> are displayed.
Sorry where do you want -v exactly?
Even though the make process clearly compiles something, the compiler flags are
not shown. According to the man page, you should add -v flag to the mkoctfile
commands:
-v, --verbose
Echo commands as they are executed.
If I use octave_pkg_build, I get a build error:
error: the following dependencies where unsatisfied:
optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.11
optim needs struct >= 1.0.9
even though octave-miscellaneous and octave-struct are installed. Seems there
is a problem with the dependency detection.
Then please file a bug against octave. Maybe the -nodeps flag needs to be added
to the octave_pkg_build macro.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.