https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097612
José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamatos(a)fc.up.pt
--- Comment #3 from José Matos <jamatos(a)fc.up.pt> ---
(In reply to Jakub Kadlčík from comment #2)
However, the package appears to already be in Fedora?
Please see RHBZ 2025908,
It wasn't built yet, but the DistGit repo exists:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyp2spec
Karolina indicated clearly that in the first comment:
This package's version 0.1.0 was approved in Nov 2021 and the
repo was
requested. Then I decided to go on with a Copr repository which provided
more flexibility. This time we need to have the package in Fedora in order
to use it in Copr natively to build packages. I'd like to get a formal
approval for the current package version, then I intend to upload the
package to the already existing pagure repository.
On the other hand I agree with you, it is a bit dubious what is the purpose of
this review.
In my humble opinion the purpose of these reviews is to ensure that basically
the code is legal and that spec file follows all the guidelines. And that
clearly is the case both in the initial review, that I have followed, and now.
We never require a re-review when there is a considerable change in the code
base. :-)
We trust the packager, and in this particular case I do trust Karolina's work
and so do not see the need for a new review.
This time we need to have the package in Fedora in order to use it in
Copr natively to build packages.
I would expect that any feedback that could/would
be provided here to be more
appropriate in other places like, for example, Fedora Python SIG mailing list.
Again, this is my view of this process. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097612