Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Bug ID: 877661 Summary: Review Request: seam-conversation - Conversation management logic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Reporter: puntogil@libero.it Type: ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/seam-conversation.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: This is where different CDI impls should abstract its conversation management logic until that is part of the CDI spec.
Fedora Account System Username: gil
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4698491
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gerard@ryan.lt Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt --- I'll review this.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? | Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt ---
Package Review ==============
Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in %package javadoc [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "LGPL (v2.1 or later)". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/grdryn/dev/fedora/review/877661-seam- conversation/licensecheck.txt [-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: CheckResultdir [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java: [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x]: Javadoc subpackages have Requires: jpackage-utils [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven: [x]: Pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call Note: Some add_maven_depmap calls found. Please check if they are correct [x]: If package uses '-Dmaven.local.depmap' explain why it was needed in a comment [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap macro [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when building with ant [x]: If package uses "-Dmaven.test.skip=true" explain why it was needed in a comment [x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun [x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [?]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [-]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [x]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
Java: [x]: Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible) [x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.)
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc19.src.rpm seam-conversation-javadoc-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch.rpm seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch.rpm seam-conversation.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US impls -> imps, impels, limps seam-conversation.src: W: invalid-url Source0: seam-conversation-3.1.0.Final.tar.xz seam-conversation.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency tomcat-lib seam-conversation.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US impls -> imps, impels, limps 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint seam-conversation-javadoc seam-conversation seam-conversation.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency tomcat-lib seam-conversation.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US impls -> imps, impels, limps 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- seam-conversation-javadoc-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
jpackage-utils
seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
cdi-api java jboss-jsf-2.1-api jboss-servlet-3.0-api jpackage-utils tomcat-lib weld-api weld-core
Provides -------- seam-conversation-javadoc-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch.rpm:
seam-conversation-javadoc = 3.1.0-1.fc19
seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch.rpm:
mvn(org.jboss.seam.conversation:seam-conversation) = 3.1.0.Final mvn(org.jboss.seam.conversation:seam-conversation-spi) = 3.1.0.Final mvn(org.jboss.seam.conversation:seam-conversation-weld) = 3.1.0.Final seam-conversation = 3.1.0-1.fc19
MD5-sum check -------------
Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 877661 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
This all looks fine. ACCEPTED.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo puntogil@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: seam-conversation Short Description: Conversation management logic Owners: gil Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: java-sig
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc18
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc17
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2012-12-29 01:30:00
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
Gerard Ryan gerard@ryan.lt changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877661
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- seam-conversation-3.1.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org