Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lv2core - An Audio Plugin Standard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232465
------- Additional Comments From green(a)redhat.com 2008-01-21 18:35 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
Builds OK; here's some rpmlint output:
lv2core.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPL2.1+
Valid tags are at
http://fedoraproject.org/Licensing; should be LGPLv2+.
Ok.
lv2core.x86_64: E: no-binary
lv2core.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
lv2core-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
Comment #1 mentioned that this package should be noarch; is there some reason
why it needs to be arch-specific? I can't find any reason why it would.
It's conceivable that the .pc file could be different for different architectures.
lv2core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
This is OK.
I'm afraid I don't know what a .ttl file is, but just to be sure: can you
confirm that the two ttl files are needed at runtime and not just during
compilation? I'm trying to determine whether or not they need to live in the
-devel package (which would sort of make the whole thing a -devel package, I
guess).
They are used at runtime by lv2 hosts.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.