Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678727
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> 2011-02-23 01:16:04 EST ---
Steve,
Thank you for your suggestions.
(In reply to comment #1)
though in this case I appreciate it supersedes the normal "use
name of tar ball" which you followed.
I'm fine with changing it to pam_afs_session. You are right, I was trying to
follow the tarball name convention. Do I need to change the name to use
underscores?
2)
A very recent addition to the "rules" is to add %{?_isa} to the
end of your -devel Buildrequires. e.g.
I incorporated your %{?_isa} suggestion in 2.1-2
Updated Spec (2.1-2):
http://adiemus.org/~kdreyer/rpms/pam-afs-session.spec
F14 build (2.1-2):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2859436
Report back here with some links to some reviews you have made.
A few days ago I reviewed #678199 . I can do more reviews next week if
necessary.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.