https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353606
--- Comment #4 from mulhern <amulhern(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #2)
> I want to make sure that this isn't just an oversight.
It's not an oversight. I am the maintainer of python-toml.
> Why is this desirable when there is python-toml package in Fedora currently?
I initially used python-toml in my applications. But the support for TOML 4
is not complete. I tried to improve it (I contributed for inline object
support) but the maintainer is slow to respond and still hasn't published a
new version with this support. Furthermore, I find the code hard to read and
modify. From what I looked at pytoml, it is better written, has a better
support of toml including edge cases.
I'd recommend python-pytoml but for some usage, python-toml will do the
trick just fine (I find it a little easier to use). That's why I'll keep
maintaining it for the foreseeable future.
Great, that makes sense.
And thanks for agreeing to the swap!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component