https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935650
Pavel Valena <pvalena(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |denis.arnaud_fedora(a)m4x.org
Flags| |needinfo?(denis.arnaud_fedo
| |ra(a)m4x.org)
| |needinfo?(denis.arnaud_fedo
| |ra(a)m4x.org)
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Valena <pvalena(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jarek Prokop from comment #2)
(In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #1)
</snip>
> we need to specify so arch-specific dependencies with richdeps
(if
> libffi...). On the upside, there's no need for the patch.
There is because the library is using hardcoded to search for `libzmq.so`[0]
which is only in the `zeromq-devel` and that package pulls in many
unnecessary devel dependencies (and libzmq.so is not present not even via
symlink in the bare `zeromq` package).
Ah, sorry, I didn't check the patch and thought it's doing something different.
Yes, we don't want zeromq-devel. Isn't that a bug, though?
Denis, could you comment, please?
[0] the line gets expanded into `libzmq.so` specifically, so if we require
`libzmq.so.5` in spec it would pull in zeromq, but it would not work.
Jarku, if it's a correct soname, can you create a PR upstream?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component