[Bug 1389202] New: Review Request: compat-openssl10-libp11 - engine_pkcs11 for openssl1.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389202
Bug ID: 1389202 Summary: Review Request: compat-openssl10-libp11 - engine_pkcs11 for openssl1.0.x Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: nmavrogi@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/compat-openssl10-libp11.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/nmavrogi/fedora/compat-openssl10-libp11-0.4.2-1.fc... Description: compatibility engine_pkcs11 for openssl1.0.x Fedora Account System Username: nmav
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389202
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1383740
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383740 [Bug 1383740] Tracker bug for dependencies that are not ported to new OpenSSL 1.1.0 API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389202
--- Comment #1 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com --- This is a compat package to provide engine_pkcs11 for applications that are linked with older openssl. It does also provide a compat libp11 package, but that is intended to be used by engine_pkcs11 exclusively. For that no headers are installed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389202
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16221480
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389202
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2017-05-29 04:05:59
--- Comment #3 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavrogi@redhat.com --- As there was no interest in review, most likely the package was not needed.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com -
Red Hat Bugzilla