Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: idioskopos - C++ Introspection Library
Alias: idioskopos
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215883
------- Additional Comments From rvinyard(a)cs.nmsu.edu 2006-12-04 20:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
> But, the specs are built by autoconf when configure is run.
Sorry about that. I meant to say, the specs are built by m4 when configure is run.
This is the section in configure that requires m4:
#########################################################################
# build spec.in files
#########################################################################
for distro in "fedora-5 FEDORA 5" "fedora-6 FEDORA 6"; do
original_params=("$@")
set -- $distro
mkdir ${1}
m4 -D DISTRO=${2} \
-D DISTRO_LIB_GROUP="${2}_${3}_LIB_GROUP" \
-D DISTRO_BUILD_REQUIRES="${2}_${3}_BUILD_REQUIRES" \
-D DISTRO_DEVEL_GROUP="${2}_${3}_DEVEL_GROUP" \
-D DISTRO_DEVEL_REQUIRES="${2}_${3}_DEVEL_REQUIRES" \
spec.m4 >${1}/${PACKAGE_NAME}.spec.in
set -- $original_params
done
And then, later on in configure.in I have the spec.in that was built above in
AC_OUTPUT().
./configure: line 22376: suse-10.1/idioskopos.spec.in: No such file
or directory
I thought I removed the suse-10.1 directories for the 0.3.3 release, but I must
have done it after I pushed the release. That's the m4 command failing because
the 0.3.3 release didn't have the 'mkdir ${1}'.
Actually I successfully rebuild this packge without m4
by mockbuild.
Now that I think about it, the m4 command will probably silently fail without m4
installed. I don't have a problem removing the m4 build-requires. I just want to
make sure it's right.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.