Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678809
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal)
--- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> 2011-11-07
12:37:34 EST ---
So, the license combination gives me a headache, but I think it all hooks
together okay (barely). I've asked Red Hat Legal to double-check it for me.
There is one notable exception to that statement: the ripemd stuff is non-free.
We tried to get the upstream copyright holder to resolve the licensing issue in
the past, but we were not successful. See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453
So, unless upstream can find a free rmd160 implementation (I am not aware of
any that is not either the reference one (which is what this code uses right
now) or derived from the reference one) or switches to a different cipher type,
this one isn't going into Fedora.
Blocking FE-Legal.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.