https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120005
Kalev Lember <klember(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |klember(a)redhat.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |klember(a)redhat.com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <klember(a)redhat.com> ---
Fedora review rust-unsafe-libyaml-0.2.2-1.fc36.src.rpm 2022-09-05
$ rpmlint rust-unsafe-libyaml-0.2.2-1.fc36.src.rpm \
rust-unsafe-libyaml+default-devel-0.2.2-1.fc38.noarch.rpm \
rust-unsafe-libyaml-devel-0.2.2-1.fc38.noarch.rpm
===================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
===================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.2.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 3
rust-unsafe-libyaml+default-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
==================================================== 3 packages and 0 specfiles
checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s
====================================================
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output looks good
+ The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines
+ The spec file name matches the base package name.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The license field in the spec file matches the actual license
+ The license text (MIT) is included in %license
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm
SHA512 (unsafe-libyaml-0.2.2.crate) =
385fed83536204170f356d3c430e7b898cfd6bd302396a63da119c55c874a5b54d0e54da0d018d7d9dab8361f268d8f645ed87f3406bbc2a07aef3a3f95712c2
SHA512 (Download/unsafe-libyaml-0.2.2.crate) =
385fed83536204170f356d3c430e7b898cfd6bd302396a63da119c55c874a5b54d0e54da0d018d7d9dab8361f268d8f645ed87f3406bbc2a07aef3a3f95712c2
+ Package builds in koji
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires look sane
n/a locale handling
+ Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
n/a Package isn't relocatable
+ Package owns all the directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files (license file is duplicate but that's fine as
per packaging guidelines)
+ Permissions are properly set
+ Consistent use of macros
+ The package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Development files should be in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ Packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a Proper .desktop file handling
+ Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
+ Package does not depend on deprecated packages
Everything looks nice and clean to me.
APPROVED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2120005