Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571416
--- Comment #6 from Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-14 05:26:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
- Could you please use real patches and not write them into the
specfile?
well, I don't have time to comment case by case right now, but in general, the
reason was using some variables available in .spec but not for standalone patch
- There is no %doc. Could you add at least: all COPYING Readme?
if I recall correctly, GiGi does not install these files so it'd have to be
added manually ... sure, it can be included
(Don't know, when I have the time to review this.
Could take a while, so if someone else stepps it, no problem.)
heh :) ... considering the state of the upstream sources, there's no rush ... I
just wanted to have some usable package, no need to push it into the distro
soon, just that others can find it at least somewhere
(In reply to comment #5)
I started working on packaging GiGi myself because my first search
didn't turn
up your effort.
no problem, as stated above, I haven't too much time to spend on this, feel
free to take the best of both efforts and link a new version here
I disagree with the reasoning behind your using 0.6.0 for the base
version
number, as the code from the official 0.7.0 tarball also self-identifies as
0.6.0, and r803 from the subversion repository is definitely more recent than
the 0.7.0 release.
that is true but it can cause troubles in dependencies, I think
please try to resolve the issue with upstream before using newer version number
I'd suggest building the included GG-Sketch and putting it in a
subpackage.
feel free to do that :-)
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.