Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531
--- Comment #2 from yellowcake-(a)gmx.net 2011-08-31 13:06:48 EDT ---
SRPM:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4023668/unison240-2.40.63-1.fc15.src.rpm
thanks for the quick response. contacted the fedora ocaml guy - rjones. He said
unison is hard to package :-)
(In reply to comment #1)
Did you try to contact the maintainers? You can find them via the
package
database:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb
Some comments:
- Use the name macro
I think I'm doing it where it's possible.
- Run rpmlint on all your packages:
unison240-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
I don't understand this
rpmlint unison240-debuginfo-2.40.63-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Also use the icon in the desktop file.
it is used, isn't it!?
- Compiler flags are not honored
uhh...how is this with ocmal compiler possible? %{optflags} gives me bad errors
- Since you require ocaml 3.12 or above, you won't take this package to EPEL5.
You can therefore drop the clean section, the buildroot rm in the install
section and the buildroot definition.
Ok, lowered to version 3.11.2 but still not compatible.
In order to find a sponsor, you should also take part in other
reviews.
good idea
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.