https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Bug ID: 1166897 Summary: Review Request: mono-nat - Mono library for automatic port forwarding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Reporter: projects.rg@smart.ms QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat-1.1.0-3.fc20.... Description: Mono library for automatic port forwarding Fedora Account System Username: raphgro
Cause of mono, rpmlint shows wired false errors: mono-nat.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-nat.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-nat-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-nat.src:2: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}
This package is already in SCM but retired. I would like to bring it alive again.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |1159091
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091 [Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/Free Real Time Strategy project that recreates the famous Command & Conquer titles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- koji rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8204347
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |bjoern.esser@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Björn "besser82" Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- Package Review ==============
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues: ======= - Package do not use a name that already exist Note: A package already exist with this name, please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mono-nat See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Packag...
---> Package exists in pkgdb, but is retiered. This is a revive-review.
===== MUST items =====
Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1166897-mono-nat/licensecheck.txt
---> According to licensecheck the license is fine.
[-]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
---> Execption for /usr/lib/ with Mono.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
---> -devel-pkg as explained below.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
---> Empty debuginfo
[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
---> There are arches known which are not working with Mono… ---> BuildArch: %{mono_arches}
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
---> Issues are present.
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
---> Parallel-makejob fails. Bug is commented in spec-file.
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
---> Cannot find any evidence on upstream's bug-tracker…
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in mono-nat- devel
---> Fix the Requires of the -devel-pkg as shown above, please.
[x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint ------- Checking: mono-nat-1.1.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm mono-nat-devel-1.1.0-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm mono-nat-1.1.0-3.fc22.src.rpm mono-nat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uPnP -> upon mono-nat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pmp -> ppm, pm, pp mono-nat.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-nat.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-nat.x86_64: W: no-documentation mono-nat-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-nat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mono-nat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uPnP -> upon mono-nat.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pmp -> ppm, pm, pp mono-nat.src:2: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name} 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 8 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@x220 /]# rpmlint mono-nat-devel mono-nat mono-nat-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-nat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mono-nat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US uPnP -> upon mono-nat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pmp -> ppm, pm, pp mono-nat.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-nat.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-nat.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. ]0;<mock-chroot><mock-chroot>[root@x220 /]# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires -------- mono-nat-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config mono-nat pkgconfig
mono-nat (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): mono(System) mono(System.Xml) mono(mscorlib)
Provides -------- mono-nat-devel: mono-nat-devel mono-nat-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(mono.nat)
mono-nat: mono(Mono.Nat) mono-nat mono-nat(x86-64)
Source checksums ---------------- http://projects.qnetp.net/attachments/download/76/mono-nat-1.1.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 34095f6524f9e6bebe0b696d76fbfcaba84cfe3ac04f811ba9d37fe14ba0bca1 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 34095f6524f9e6bebe0b696d76fbfcaba84cfe3ac04f811ba9d37fe14ba0bca1
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1166897 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
===== Solution =====
**NOT** approved, fix them issues and I'll have another run.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz --- Please use ExclusiveArch: %{mono_arches} as Mono is not available on all platforms Fedora supports.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Hi Björn,
thanks for the review.
What should be done about the parallel compilation issue? My suggestion is to use just xbuild directlyinstead of make.
As it turns out, the project moved to github. You can find there a valid license.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Release #4.
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat-1.1.0-4.fc20....
rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8381671
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #6 from Björn "besser82" Esser bjoern.esser@gmail.com --- Currently package FTBFS…
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1166897 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1166897 INFO: --> SRPM url: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat-1.1.0-4.fc20.... INFO: --> Spec url: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat.spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1166897-mono-nat INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files INFO: Downloading (Source2): https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mono/Mono.Nat/master/LICENSE#/mono-nat_LIC... WARNING: Cannot download url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mono/Mono.Nat/master/LICENSE#/mono-nat_LIC... INFO: No upstream for (Source2): LICENSE INFO: Downloading (Source3): https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Mailaender/Mono.Nat/fb17acfe121f5a6d621bc4... WARNING: Cannot download url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Mailaender/Mono.Nat/fb17acfe121f5a6d621bc4... INFO: No upstream for (Source3): README.md INFO: Downloading (Source0): https://github.com/mono/Mono.Nat/archive/Mono.Nat-1.1.0.tar.gz#/mono-nat-1.1... INFO: Downloading (Source1): https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mono/Mono.Nat/master/AUTHORS#/mono-nat_AUT... WARNING: Cannot download url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mono/Mono.Nat/master/AUTHORS#/mono-nat_AUT... INFO: No upstream for (Source1): AUTHORS INFO: Running checks and generating report INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1166897-mono-nat/results INFO: Build completed INFO: Installing built package(s) INFO: Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api ERROR: 'Source2 file /home/besser82/shared/fedora/review/1166897-mono-nat/srpm-unpacked/LICENSE is missing in src.rpm. Conditional source inclusion?' (logs in /home/besser82/.cache/fedora-review.log)
If you want to have the files located on github, use the *complete* github-tarball instead…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- (In reply to Björn "besser82" Esser from comment #6)
Currently package FTBFS… … If you want to have the files located on github, use the *complete* github-tarball instead…
As it turns out, the github tarball luckily includes LICENSE and AUTHORS. Unfortunately, this tarball does not provide any Makefile nor Makefile.in files, but Makefile.am only. I tried to tweak that somehow with autoreconf or automake, but without any success so far.
Please help to use automake properly. Otherwise, I would suggest to leave mono-nat as dead as it is ("to not wake up any bad zombie").
For reference, I'll upload the spec file without any claim to fix FTBFS.
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat.spec
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JMcPjo + umask 022 + cd /home/build/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd Mono.Nat-Mono.Nat-1.1.0 + pushd src ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/Mono.Nat-Mono.Nat-1.1.0/src ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/Mono.Nat-Mono.Nat-1.1.0 + autoreconf -i configure.ac:5: installing './install-sh' configure.ac:5: installing './missing' Makefile.include:65: error: 'pkglibdir' is not a legitimate directory for 'SCRIPTS' Mono.Nat/Makefile.am:96: 'Makefile.include' included from here autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.JMcPjo (%build)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/issues/7140
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mono-nat - |Review Request: mono-nat - |Mono library for automatic |Mono library for automatic |port forwarding |port forwarding (new github | |project name: Mono.NAT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|NotReady |
--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Release #7. (5 and 6 skipped due to build problems)
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat-1.1.0-7.fc21....
rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585907
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585923
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjoern.esser@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai | |l.com)
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- ping?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Assignee|bjoern.esser@gmail.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org Flags|needinfo?(bjoern.esser@gmai |needinfo?(extras-qa@fedorap |l.com) |roject.org)
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- No reply since over two weeks, removing assigned reviewer due to I guess it is no interest any more.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1089278, 1089426
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089278 [Bug 1089278] Mono 3.4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089426 [Bug 1089426] Fedora's version of Mono is horrendously outdated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Moez Roy moez.roy@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1220138
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220138 [Bug 1220138] EPEL's version of Mono is horrendously outdated with lots of vulns. [epel-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodrigo@pereyradiaz.com.ar changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |1221559
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559 [Bug 1221559] Mono 4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Bug 1166897 depends on bug 1089278, which changed state.
Bug 1089278 Summary: Mono 3.4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089278
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mono-nat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/mono-nat-1.1.0-8.20150427git0...
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11390769
* Wed Oct 07 2015 Raphael Groner <> - 1.1.0-8.20150427git025b570 - switch back to nterry fork - rebuild with mono4 - use gacutil and sign binary - clean useless commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(extras-qa@fedorap | |roject.org) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/mono-nat-1.1.0-8.20150427git0...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Bug 1166897 depends on bug 1089426, which changed state.
Bug 1089426 Summary: Fedora's version of Mono is horrendously outdated with lots of vulns. [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089426
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #15 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodrigo@pereyradiaz.com.ar --- I try review but %check fail in mock enviroment with
"/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mN8wMc: line 36: killall: command not found"
Please, not use killall or add "buildrequired: psmisc"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Hi Claudio, thanks for your interest. The test is there to ensure the binary is callable but it's running forever while we don't cancel the process. Now I use the timeout command instead of killall.
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/mono-nat-1.1.0-9.20150427git0...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #17 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11738642
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|1159091 (openra) | Flags| |needinfo?(claudiorodrigo@pe | |reyradiaz.com.ar)
--- Comment #18 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- OpenRA moved to Open.NAT and obsoletes Mono.NAT, upstream is dead anyways. I doubt there's any sense to continue with this review?
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091 [Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/Free Real Time Strategy project [+Tracker to unbundle all dependencies]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodrigo@pereyradiaz.com.ar changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(claudiorodrigo@pe | |reyradiaz.com.ar) |
--- Comment #19 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodrigo@pereyradiaz.com.ar --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #18)
OpenRA moved to Open.NAT and obsoletes Mono.NAT, upstream is dead anyways. I doubt there's any sense to continue with this review?
I see that Mono.NAT is still alive. Few minor changes but alive. Also is under mono umbrella on github I thing that will be good have Mono.NAT and Open.NAT into Fedora. Like other fork projects.
Open.Nat have a different focus in some features. See http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/807861/Open-NAT-A-NAT-Traversal-library-...
If you want open a new review for Open.Nat I will check it to.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
--- Comment #20 from Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms --- There was some activity in the mono master branch for dotnet 4.5. commit/2889dda3dcf7ab9e70d02ca7c746f156e39934a2
Should we step from nterry fork to the original mono GitHub?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Bug 1166897 depends on bug 1221559, which changed state.
Bug 1221559 Summary: Mono 4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221559
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897
Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2016-11-05 19:05:53
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Bug 1166897 depends on bug 1220138, which changed state.
Bug 1220138 Summary: EPEL's version of Mono is horrendously outdated with lots of vulns. [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220138
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org