https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #55 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix(a)gmail.com> ---
Okay, looking into this more (also see comment 11, comment 12,
comment 13, comment 14), the biggest issue I see is that it should be marked as bundled
with gdb and binutils, not gcc. I don't think there's actually a bundled gnulib in
gcc. That's probably why I was confused above. Assuming the ChangeLog is correct, I
will version it with a date as done in system gdb[0].
I checked the regular gcc package and yes, it's not there:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/blob/master/f/gcc.spec
It's bundled with gdb, however:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdb/blob/master/f/gdb.spec#_105
I'm not sure I understand. In comment 23, comment 24, comment 25,
and comment 35 it was decided to move everything to the /usr/msp430-elf prefix and symlink
prefixed binaries as described in the packaging guidelines[1]. Why are we now moving
things back to unprefixed system %{_libdir}? These unprefixed binaries should never come
into contact with any non-msp430 compiler, and as far as I can tell getting rid of them
breaks compatibility with how "upsteam" (TI, so, more midstream...) intends the
compiler to work, which as far as I'm concerned would make this package a little
pointless.
Yes, you're right. Apologies for my previous comment. I confused myself. The
way it is right now makes more sense, of course. Let's keep that part as it is
now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component